ACNDF
Price
$0.88
Change
+$0.01 (+1.15%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
FPH
Price
$5.47
Change
-$0.96 (-14.93%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
218.29M
81 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACNDF vs FPH

Header iconACNDF vs FPH Comparison
Open Charts ACNDF vs FPHBanner chart's image
Ascendas India Trust
Price$0.88
Change+$0.01 (+1.15%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization1.13B
Five Point Holdings
Price$5.47
Change-$0.96 (-14.93%)
Volume$1.19M
Capitalization218.29M
ACNDF vs FPH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACNDF vs. FPH commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACNDF is a Hold and FPH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ACNDF: $0.88 vs. FPH: $5.47)
Brand notoriety: ACNDF and FPH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACNDF: 26% vs. FPH: 716%
Market capitalization -- ACNDF: $1.13B vs. FPH: $218.29M
ACNDF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.13B. FPH’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $218.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACNDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFPH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ACNDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FPH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACNDF is a better buy in the long-term than FPH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACNDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FPH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACNDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FPH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACNDF is a better buy in the short-term than FPH.

Price Growth

ACNDF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -0.67% price change this week, while FPH (@Real Estate Development) price change was -8.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

FPH is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.21% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACNDF($1.13B) has a higher market cap than FPH($218M). ACNDF has higher P/E ratio than FPH: ACNDF (11.45) vs FPH (4.16). FPH YTD gains are higher at: 44.709 vs. ACNDF (14.247). ACNDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 284M vs. FPH (46.1M). FPH has more cash in the bank: 354M vs. ACNDF (167M). FPH has less debt than ACNDF: FPH (633M) vs ACNDF (1.24B). FPH (212M) and ACNDF (211M) have equivalent revenues.
ACNDFFPHACNDF / FPH
Capitalization1.13B218M518%
EBITDA284M46.1M616%
Gain YTD14.24744.70932%
P/E Ratio11.454.16275%
Revenue211M212M100%
Total Cash167M354M47%
Total Debt1.24B633M196%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACNDF vs FPH: Fundamental Ratings
ACNDF
FPH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3711
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10085
SMR RATING
1..100
4761
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4452
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9736
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACNDF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FPH (95) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that ACNDF’s stock grew significantly faster than FPH’s over the last 12 months.

FPH's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as ACNDF (100) in the null industry. This means that FPH’s stock grew similarly to ACNDF’s over the last 12 months.

ACNDF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FPH (61) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that ACNDF’s stock grew similarly to FPH’s over the last 12 months.

ACNDF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as FPH (52) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that ACNDF’s stock grew similarly to FPH’s over the last 12 months.

FPH's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACNDF (97) in the null industry. This means that FPH’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACNDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACNDFFPH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NILTF0.04N/A
N/A
NICAN LTD.
GNNSF2.31N/A
N/A
Genscript Biotech Corp
SUGBY80.02N/A
N/A
Suruga Bank Ltd.
TRPCF62.50N/A
N/A
Trip.com Group Limited
TEUTF0.66-0.01
-1.49%
Teuton Resources Corp.

ACNDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACNDF and CLILF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACNDF and CLILF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACNDF
1D Price
Change %
ACNDF100%
N/A
CLILF - ACNDF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRUNF - ACNDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRGTF - ACNDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWPFF - ACNDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPH - ACNDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-14.93%
More

FPH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPH and CWK have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPH and CWK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPH
1D Price
Change %
FPH100%
-14.93%
CWK - FPH
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
JOE - FPH
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
JLL - FPH
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
NMRK - FPH
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
RMR - FPH
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
More