ACNDF
Price
$0.86
Change
+$0.04 (+4.88%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
CLILF
Price
$2.10
Change
+$0.13 (+6.60%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
13.16B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACNDF vs CLILF

Header iconACNDF vs CLILF Comparison
Open Charts ACNDF vs CLILFBanner chart's image
Ascendas India Trust
Price$0.86
Change+$0.04 (+4.88%)
Volume$3.17K
Capitalization1.13B
Capitaland Investment
Price$2.10
Change+$0.13 (+6.60%)
Volume$2.6K
Capitalization13.16B
ACNDF vs CLILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACNDF vs. CLILF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACNDF is a Hold and CLILF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ACNDF: $0.86 vs. CLILF: $2.10)
Brand notoriety: ACNDF and CLILF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACNDF: 35% vs. CLILF: 4%
Market capitalization -- ACNDF: $1.13B vs. CLILF: $13.16B
ACNDF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.13B. CLILF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $13.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACNDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLILF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ACNDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLILF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACNDF is a better buy in the long-term than CLILF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACNDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLILF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACNDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CLILF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACNDF is a better buy in the short-term than CLILF.

Price Growth

ACNDF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +6.24% price change this week, while CLILF (@Real Estate Development) price change was +6.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +31.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +35.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+31.17% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLILF($13.2B) has a higher market cap than ACNDF($1.13B). CLILF has higher P/E ratio than ACNDF: CLILF (22.52) vs ACNDF (11.45). ACNDF YTD gains are higher at: 11.545 vs. CLILF (8.376). CLILF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.96B vs. ACNDF (284M). CLILF has higher revenues than ACNDF: CLILF (2.88B) vs ACNDF (211M).
ACNDFCLILFACNDF / CLILF
Capitalization1.13B13.2B9%
EBITDA284M1.96B14%
Gain YTD11.5458.376138%
P/E Ratio11.4522.5251%
Revenue211M2.88B7%
Total Cash167MN/A-
Total Debt1.24BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACNDF: Fundamental Ratings
ACNDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACNDFCLILF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
38%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMMX2.550.36
+16.44%
Immix Biopharma
SYTA3.400.23
+7.26%
Siyata Mobile Inc
PCTY184.624.58
+2.54%
Paylocity Holding Corp
KRNY6.950.12
+1.76%
Kearny Financial Corp
RXST13.05-0.09
-0.68%
RxSight

ACNDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACNDF and CLILF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACNDF and CLILF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACNDF
1D Price
Change %
ACNDF100%
+4.11%
CLILF - ACNDF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRUNF - ACNDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.13%
GRGTF - ACNDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
SWPFF - ACNDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPH - ACNDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
More

CLILF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLILF and ACNDF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLILF and ACNDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLILF
1D Price
Change %
CLILF100%
N/A
ACNDF - CLILF
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.11%
SWPFF - CLILF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPH - CLILF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
AWCA - CLILF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
OMH - CLILF
6%
Poorly correlated
+8.82%
More