ACNDF
Price
$0.93
Change
-$0.04 (-4.12%)
Updated
Dec 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.28B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CBRE
Price
$164.26
Change
-$0.68 (-0.41%)
Updated
Dec 26, 02:24 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
49.08B
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACNDF vs CBRE

Header iconACNDF vs CBRE Comparison
Open Charts ACNDF vs CBREBanner chart's image
Ascendas India Trust
Price$0.93
Change-$0.04 (-4.12%)
Volume$2.54K
Capitalization1.28B
Cbre Group
Price$164.26
Change-$0.68 (-0.41%)
Volume$100
Capitalization49.08B
ACNDF vs CBRE Comparison Chart in %
ACNDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CBRE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACNDF vs. CBRE commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACNDF is a Hold and CBRE is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ACNDF: $0.93 vs. CBRE: $164.94)
Brand notoriety: ACNDF and CBRE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACNDF: 54% vs. CBRE: 31%
Market capitalization -- ACNDF: $1.28B vs. CBRE: $49.08B
ACNDF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.28B. CBRE’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $49.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACNDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCBRE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ACNDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CBRE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBRE is a better buy in the long-term than ACNDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACNDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CBRE’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACNDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CBRE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBRE is a better buy in the short-term than ACNDF.

Price Growth

ACNDF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +1.06% price change this week, while CBRE (@Real Estate Development) price change was +3.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBRE is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.56% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBRE($49.1B) has a higher market cap than ACNDF($1.28B). CBRE has higher P/E ratio than ACNDF: CBRE (40.83) vs ACNDF (4.11). CBRE YTD gains are higher at: 25.630 vs. ACNDF (21.403). CBRE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.27B vs. ACNDF (492M). CBRE has more cash in the bank: 1.67B vs. ACNDF (129M). ACNDF has less debt than CBRE: ACNDF (1.94B) vs CBRE (9.48B). CBRE has higher revenues than ACNDF: CBRE (39.3B) vs ACNDF (291M).
ACNDFCBREACNDF / CBRE
Capitalization1.28B49.1B3%
EBITDA492M2.27B22%
Gain YTD21.40325.63084%
P/E Ratio4.1140.8310%
Revenue291M39.3B1%
Total Cash129M1.67B8%
Total Debt1.94B9.48B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACNDF vs CBRE: Fundamental Ratings
ACNDF
CBRE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5028
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10017
SMR RATING
1..100
4756
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5131
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9254
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACNDF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBRE (88) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that ACNDF’s stock grew significantly faster than CBRE’s over the last 12 months.

CBRE's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACNDF (100) in the null industry. This means that CBRE’s stock grew significantly faster than ACNDF’s over the last 12 months.

ACNDF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CBRE (56) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that ACNDF’s stock grew similarly to CBRE’s over the last 12 months.

CBRE's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as ACNDF (51) in the null industry. This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to ACNDF’s over the last 12 months.

CBRE's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACNDF (92) in the null industry. This means that CBRE’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACNDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACNDFCBRE
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACNDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CBRE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEAMX37.310.16
+0.43%
Neiman Large Cap Value A
RSVAX24.270.06
+0.25%
Victory RS Value A
IPMSX21.050.03
+0.14%
Voya Index Plus MidCap Port S
BDOAX12.56N/A
N/A
iShares MSCI Total Intl Idx Inv A
STEYX16.08N/A
N/A
AB International Strat Eqs Adv

ACNDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACNDF and CBRE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACNDF and CBRE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACNDF
1D Price
Change %
ACNDF100%
N/A
CBRE - ACNDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
IWGFF - ACNDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JLL - ACNDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
BEKE - ACNDF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
ADPPF - ACNDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CBRE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBRE has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBRE jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBRE
1D Price
Change %
CBRE100%
+0.67%
JLL - CBRE
92%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
CWK - CBRE
82%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
CIGI - CBRE
80%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
NMRK - CBRE
79%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
MMI - CBRE
67%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
More