ACMTA
Price
$29.05
Change
-$9.10 (-23.85%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
22.4M
HIPO
Price
$36.59
Change
+$3.35 (+10.08%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
915.78M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACMTA vs HIPO

Header iconACMTA vs HIPO Comparison
Open Charts ACMTA vs HIPOBanner chart's image
ACMAT
Price$29.05
Change-$9.10 (-23.85%)
Volume$100
Capitalization22.4M
Hippo Holdings
Price$36.59
Change+$3.35 (+10.08%)
Volume$508.78K
Capitalization915.78M
ACMTA vs HIPO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACMTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACMTA vs. HIPO commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACMTA is a Hold and HIPO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (ACMTA: $29.05 vs. HIPO: $36.59)
Brand notoriety: ACMTA and HIPO are both not notable
ACMTA represents the Specialty Insurance, while HIPO is part of the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACMTA: 100% vs. HIPO: 275%
Market capitalization -- ACMTA: $22.4M vs. HIPO: $915.78M
ACMTA [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $22.4M. HIPO’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $915.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $16.43B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $144.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.64B. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACMTA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHIPO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ACMTA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HIPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ACMTA and HIPO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACMTA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIPO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACMTA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • HIPO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HIPO is a better buy in the short-term than ACMTA.

Price Growth

ACMTA (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -23.85% price change this week, while HIPO (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +8.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.21%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-0.59% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.28% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HIPO($916M) has a higher market cap than ACMTA($22.4M). HIPO YTD gains are higher at: 36.683 vs. ACMTA (0.000).
ACMTAHIPOACMTA / HIPO
Capitalization22.4M916M2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.00036.683-
P/E Ratio66.48N/A-
RevenueN/A425M-
Total CashN/A454M-
Total DebtN/A54M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACMTA: Fundamental Ratings
ACMTA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
97
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
85
SMR RATING
1..100
6
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACMTAHIPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
3%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
4%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACMTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGOQX27.090.55
+2.07%
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities R2
ARAGX11.000.07
+0.64%
Aristotle Growth Equity A
URNQX58.680.27
+0.46%
Victory Nasdaq 100 Index R6
DIFGX12.53N/A
N/A
MFS Diversified Income R4
FSEQX14.22N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable U.S. Eq I

ACMTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACMTA and BZLYF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACMTA and BZLYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACMTA
1D Price
Change %
ACMTA100%
N/A
BZLYF - ACMTA
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
HIPO - ACMTA
5%
Poorly correlated
+10.08%
JTGPF - ACMTA
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LCSHF - ACMTA
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACMT - ACMTA
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HIPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIPO has been loosely correlated with LMND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HIPO jumps, then LMND could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIPO
1D Price
Change %
HIPO100%
+10.08%
LMND - HIPO
51%
Loosely correlated
+5.43%
ROOT - HIPO
46%
Loosely correlated
+8.74%
FNF - HIPO
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
ORI - HIPO
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
THG - HIPO
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
More