ACMLF vs MAPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACMLF is a Hold and MAPS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACMLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAPS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ACMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MAPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MAPS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MAPS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ACMLF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MAPS (@Packaged Software) price change was +29.82% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
MAPS is expected to report earnings on Mar 14, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.61% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| ACMLF | MAPS | ACMLF / MAPS | |
| Capitalization | 493M | 123M | 401% |
| EBITDA | 25.4M | -8.23M | -309% |
| Gain YTD | -13.102 | 38.776 | -34% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.83 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 297M | 196M | 152% |
| Total Cash | 26.6M | 27.7M | 96% |
| Total Debt | 10M | 34.7M | 29% |
| MAPS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
ACMLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACMLF and MAPS have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACMLF and MAPS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACMLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACMLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MAPS - ACMLF | 32% Poorly correlated | +16.80% | ||
| AISXF - ACMLF | 31% Poorly correlated | -9.50% | ||
| ALAR - ACMLF | 28% Poorly correlated | -9.36% | ||
| NMYSF - ACMLF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NEXPF - ACMLF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
MAPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MAPS and ACMLF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAPS and ACMLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAPS | 100% | +16.80% | ||
| ACMLF - MAPS | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VERB - MAPS | 27% Poorly correlated | -10.52% | ||
| LAW - MAPS | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.57% | ||
| CRNC - MAPS | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.26% | ||
| MTTR - MAPS | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||