Advertisement
ACLLY vs RYCEY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACLLY is a Hold and RYCEY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACLLY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRYCEY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- ACLLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RYCEY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACLLY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RYCEY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACLLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
- RYCEY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
ACLLY (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +1.19% price change this week, while RYCEY (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -2.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was -1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.77%.
Reported Earning Dates
RYCEY is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aerospace & Defense (-1.43% weekly)Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| ACLLY | RYCEY | ACLLY / RYCEY | |
| Capitalization | 8.31B | 112B | 7% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 77.810 | 88.582 | 88% |
| P/E Ratio | 48.73 | 32.82 | 148% |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 521M | N/A | - |
RYCEY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ACLLY | RYCEY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 76% | 11 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BOE | 11.48 | 0.09 | +0.79% |
| BlackRock Enhanced Global Dividend Trust | |||
| IWS | 137.36 | 0.69 | +0.50% |
| iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | |||
| BOAT | 30.96 | 0.11 | +0.35% |
| SonicShares™ Global Shipping ETF | |||
| TAXX | 50.71 | 0.03 | +0.06% |
| BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Awr Shrt Dur ETF | |||
| LFAI | 125.51 | N/A | N/A |
| LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF | |||
ACLLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACLLY and RYCEY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACLLY and RYCEY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACLLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACLLY | 100% | +0.71% | ||
| RYCEY - ACLLY | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.41% | ||
| SAFRY - ACLLY | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
| EADSY - ACLLY | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
| HNSDF - ACLLY | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EADSF - ACLLY | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
More | ||||
RYCEY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RYCEY has been loosely correlated with SAFRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RYCEY jumps, then SAFRY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RYCEY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RYCEY | 100% | -1.41% | ||
| SAFRY - RYCEY | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| EADSY - RYCEY | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| RNMBY - RYCEY | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| MTUAY - RYCEY | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| BAESY - RYCEY | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
More | ||||