ACKDF
Price
$5.22
Change
+$0.37 (+7.63%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
8.4B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAC
Price
$277.32
Change
-$6.13 (-2.16%)
Updated
Feb 4, 01:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.32B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACKDF vs PAC

Header iconACKDF vs PAC Comparison
Open Charts ACKDF vs PACBanner chart's image
Auckland International Airport
Price$5.22
Change+$0.37 (+7.63%)
Volume$298
Capitalization8.4B
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico SAB de CV Amer Dep Shares (each rep 10 Ser B shares)
Price$277.32
Change-$6.13 (-2.16%)
Volume$100
Capitalization14.32B
ACKDF vs PAC Comparison Chart in %
ACKDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACKDF vs. PAC commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACKDF is a StrongBuy and PAC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (ACKDF: $5.22 vs. PAC: $283.45)
Brand notoriety: ACKDF and PAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Air Freight/Couriers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACKDF: 10% vs. PAC: 193%
Market capitalization -- ACKDF: $8.4B vs. PAC: $14.32B
ACKDF [@Air Freight/Couriers] is valued at $8.4B. PAC’s [@Air Freight/Couriers] market capitalization is $14.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry ranges from $58.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry is $8.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACKDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ACKDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAC is a better buy in the long-term than ACKDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACKDF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACKDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACKDF is a better buy in the short-term than PAC.

Price Growth

ACKDF (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а +10.82% price change this week, while PAC (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was -0.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAC is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Air Freight/Couriers (-1.03% weekly)

The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAC($14.3B) has a higher market cap than ACKDF($8.4B). ACKDF has higher P/E ratio than PAC: ACKDF (33.62) vs PAC (24.64). ACKDF YTD gains are higher at: 14.395 vs. PAC (7.518). PAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 22.1B vs. ACKDF (827M). PAC has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. ACKDF (568M). PAC has higher revenues than ACKDF: PAC (41.1B) vs ACKDF (929M).
ACKDFPACACKDF / PAC
Capitalization8.4B14.3B59%
EBITDA827M22.1B4%
Gain YTD14.3957.518191%
P/E Ratio33.6224.64136%
Revenue929M41.1B2%
Total Cash568M11.7B5%
Total Debt2.49BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACKDF vs PAC: Fundamental Ratings
ACKDF
PAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2280
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10016
SMR RATING
1..100
9019
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10038
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAC's Valuation (42) in the Other Transportation industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACKDF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Other Transportation industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACKDF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew significantly faster than ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's SMR Rating (19) in the Other Transportation industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACKDF (90) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew significantly faster than ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as ACKDF (74) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew similarly to ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Other Transportation industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACKDF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACKDFPAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACKDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTC77.54N/A
+0.01%
Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF
BINT29.92-0.01
-0.03%
Bluemonte Global Equity ETF
OCTT43.85-0.19
-0.42%
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Oct ETF
UDEC39.82-0.24
-0.60%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Dec
THNR25.65-0.72
-2.73%
Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF

ACKDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACKDF and UZAPF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACKDF and UZAPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACKDF
1D Price
Change %
ACKDF100%
+10.82%
UZAPF - ACKDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
AEOXF - ACKDF
18%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
OMAB - ACKDF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.19%
PAC - ACKDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
SRTA - ACKDF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.12%
More

PAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAC has been closely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAC jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAC
1D Price
Change %
PAC100%
+2.23%
OMAB - PAC
73%
Closely correlated
+2.19%
ASR - PAC
72%
Closely correlated
+4.33%
CAAP - PAC
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASRMF - PAC
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
GPAEF - PAC
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.50%
More