ACKDF
Price
$4.67
Change
+$0.68 (+17.04%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.53B
PAC
Price
$250.38
Change
+$0.45 (+0.18%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.64B
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACKDF vs PAC

Header iconACKDF vs PAC Comparison
Open Charts ACKDF vs PACBanner chart's image
Auckland International Airport
Price$4.67
Change+$0.68 (+17.04%)
Volume$523
Capitalization7.53B
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico SAB de CV Amer Dep Shares (each rep 10 Ser B shares)
Price$250.38
Change+$0.45 (+0.18%)
Volume$630
Capitalization12.64B
ACKDF vs PAC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACKDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACKDF vs. PAC commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACKDF is a Hold and PAC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (ACKDF: $4.67 vs. PAC: $249.93)
Brand notoriety: ACKDF and PAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Air Freight/Couriers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACKDF: 85% vs. PAC: 53%
Market capitalization -- ACKDF: $7.53B vs. PAC: $12.63B
ACKDF [@Air Freight/Couriers] is valued at $7.53B. PAC’s [@Air Freight/Couriers] market capitalization is $12.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry ranges from $58.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry is $7.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACKDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ACKDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAC is a better buy in the long-term than ACKDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACKDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACKDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAC is a better buy in the short-term than ACKDF.

Price Growth

ACKDF (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а +17.04% price change this week, while PAC (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was +3.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was -1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Air Freight/Couriers (-1.75% weekly)

The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAC($12.6B) has a higher market cap than ACKDF($7.54B). ACKDF has higher P/E ratio than PAC: ACKDF (30.71) vs PAC (25.19). PAC YTD gains are higher at: 48.197 vs. ACKDF (-9.320).
ACKDFPACACKDF / PAC
Capitalization7.54B12.6B60%
EBITDAN/A21.5B-
Gain YTD-9.32048.197-19%
P/E Ratio30.7125.19122%
RevenueN/A39.8B-
Total CashN/A9.7B-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACKDF vs PAC: Fundamental Ratings
ACKDF
PAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7914
SMR RATING
1..100
9419
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10022
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
34n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAC's Valuation (73) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as ACKDF (99) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew similarly to ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Other Transportation industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACKDF (79) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's SMR Rating (19) in the Other Transportation industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACKDF (94) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew significantly faster than ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as ACKDF (60) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew similarly to ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Other Transportation industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACKDF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAC’s stock grew significantly faster than ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACKDFPAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACKDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSTY15.620.36
+2.36%
YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
PFO9.430.06
+0.64%
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Opportunity Fund
JPSE50.090.22
+0.44%
JPMorgan Divers Ret US Small Cap Eq ETF
BBIB99.920.32
+0.33%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S.TrsBd3-10YrETF
GARP62.750.08
+0.13%
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF

ACKDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACKDF and AEOXF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACKDF and AEOXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACKDF
1D Price
Change %
ACKDF100%
N/A
AEOXF - ACKDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
OMAB - ACKDF
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
SRTA - ACKDF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.87%
ASR - ACKDF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
PAC - ACKDF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
More

PAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAC has been closely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAC jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAC
1D Price
Change %
PAC100%
+1.16%
OMAB - PAC
71%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
ASR - PAC
68%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
ASLE - PAC
19%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
SRTA - PAC
14%
Poorly correlated
-2.87%
CAAP - PAC
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
More