It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACKDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOMAB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACKDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMAB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ACKDF (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а -10.58% price change this week, while OMAB (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was +0.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.13%.
The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.
| ACKDF | OMAB | ACKDF / OMAB | |
| Capitalization | 7.52B | 5.09B | 148% |
| EBITDA | 827M | 9.77B | 8% |
| Gain YTD | -16.311 | 56.468 | -29% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.44 | 17.55 | 168% |
| Revenue | 929M | 15.7B | 6% |
| Total Cash | 568M | 3.35B | 17% |
| Total Debt | 2.49B | 13.6B | 18% |
ACKDF | OMAB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 21 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OMAB's Valuation (72) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as ACKDF (99) in the null industry. This means that OMAB’s stock grew similarly to ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.
OMAB's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Other Transportation industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACKDF (100) in the null industry. This means that OMAB’s stock grew significantly faster than ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.
OMAB's SMR Rating (17) in the Other Transportation industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACKDF (91) in the null industry. This means that OMAB’s stock grew significantly faster than ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.
OMAB's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as ACKDF (76) in the null industry. This means that OMAB’s stock grew similarly to ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.
OMAB's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Other Transportation industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACKDF (100) in the null industry. This means that OMAB’s stock grew significantly faster than ACKDF’s over the last 12 months.
| ACKDF | OMAB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 64% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACKDF and UZAPF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACKDF and UZAPF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACKDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACKDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| UZAPF - ACKDF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AEOXF - ACKDF | 18% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OMAB - ACKDF | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.62% | ||
| PAC - ACKDF | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
| SRTA - ACKDF | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.19% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMAB has been closely correlated with PAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMAB jumps, then PAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OMAB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMAB | 100% | -1.62% | ||
| PAC - OMAB | 71% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| ASR - OMAB | 70% Closely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| CAAP - OMAB | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.48% | ||
| ASRMF - OMAB | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
| GPAEF - OMAB | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||