Advertisement
ACIW vs MNDO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACIW is a Hold and MNDO is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACIW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNDO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ACIW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MNDO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACIW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNDO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACIW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
- MNDO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ACIW (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.71% price change this week, while MNDO (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.67%.
Reported Earning Dates
ACIW is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.65% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| ACIW | MNDO | ACIW / MNDO | |
| Capitalization | 3.53B | 38.3M | 9,227% |
| EBITDA | 360M | 4.95M | 7,280% |
| Gain YTD | -13.177 | -20.592 | 64% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.92 | 7.49 | 386% |
| Revenue | 1.45B | 21.6M | 6,727% |
| Total Cash | 164M | 16.6M | 988% |
| Total Debt | 1.08B | 642K | 167,601% |
ACIW | MNDO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 71 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 82 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MNDO's Valuation (2) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACIW (48) in the null industry. This means that MNDO’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACIW’s over the last 12 months.
ACIW's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MNDO (71) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that ACIW’s stock grew similarly to MNDO’s over the last 12 months.
ACIW's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as MNDO (49) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that ACIW’s stock grew similarly to MNDO’s over the last 12 months.
ACIW's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as MNDO (82) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that ACIW’s stock grew similarly to MNDO’s over the last 12 months.
MNDO's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACIW (86) in the null industry. This means that MNDO’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACIW’s over the last 12 months.
| ACIW | MNDO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 28% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 36% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 34% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TFLR | 51.42 | -0.04 | -0.08% |
| T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF | |||
| USEP | 35.92 | -0.26 | -0.73% |
| Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF-Sep | |||
| GPIX | 48.33 | -0.43 | -0.88% |
| Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Inc ETF | |||
| SCHH | 21.29 | -0.20 | -0.93% |
| Schwab US REIT ETF™ | |||
| MSFL | 27.58 | -0.49 | -1.75% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF | |||
ACIW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACIW has been loosely correlated with CPAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACIW jumps, then CPAY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACIW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACIW | 100% | -3.86% | ||
| CPAY - ACIW | 54% Loosely correlated | -7.66% | ||
| QTWO - ACIW | 54% Loosely correlated | -3.15% | ||
| EEFT - ACIW | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.92% | ||
| SHOP - ACIW | 51% Loosely correlated | -3.54% | ||
| HUBS - ACIW | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.67% | ||
More | ||||
MNDO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MNDO and CPAY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNDO and CPAY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNDO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNDO | 100% | -0.71% | ||
| CPAY - MNDO | 31% Poorly correlated | -7.66% | ||
| ACIW - MNDO | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.86% | ||
| FTNT - MNDO | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.82% | ||
| SHOP - MNDO | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.54% | ||
| SSNC - MNDO | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.99% | ||
More | ||||