ACIW
Price
$51.24
Change
+$0.03 (+0.06%)
Updated
Sep 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.28B
51 days until earnings call
HUBS
Price
$502.29
Change
+$3.76 (+0.75%)
Updated
Sep 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
26.27B
57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACIW vs HUBS

Header iconACIW vs HUBS Comparison
Open Charts ACIW vs HUBSBanner chart's image
ACI Worldwide
Price$51.24
Change+$0.03 (+0.06%)
Volume$18.3K
Capitalization5.28B
HUBSPOT
Price$502.29
Change+$3.76 (+0.75%)
Volume$4.22K
Capitalization26.27B
ACIW vs HUBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACIW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACIW vs. HUBS commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACIW is a StrongBuy and HUBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (ACIW: $51.21 vs. HUBS: $498.53)
Brand notoriety: ACIW and HUBS are both not notable
ACIW represents the Computer Communications, while HUBS is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACIW: 166% vs. HUBS: 97%
Market capitalization -- ACIW: $5.28B vs. HUBS: $26.27B
ACIW [@Computer Communications] is valued at $5.28B. HUBS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $26.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.7T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $311.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.05B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACIW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ACIW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACIW is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACIW’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACIW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HUBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACIW is a better buy in the short-term than HUBS.

Price Growth

ACIW (@Computer Communications) experienced а +3.77% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.25%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACIW is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+2.70% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (+1.76% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($26.3B) has a higher market cap than ACIW($5.28B). HUBS has higher P/E ratio than ACIW: HUBS (7023.44) vs ACIW (21.70). ACIW YTD gains are higher at: -1.348 vs. HUBS (-28.451). ACIW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 485M vs. HUBS (126M). HUBS has more cash in the bank: 1.67B vs. ACIW (190M). HUBS has less debt than ACIW: HUBS (281M) vs ACIW (930M). HUBS has higher revenues than ACIW: HUBS (2.85B) vs ACIW (1.7B).
ACIWHUBSACIW / HUBS
Capitalization5.28B26.3B20%
EBITDA485M126M385%
Gain YTD-1.348-28.4515%
P/E Ratio21.707023.440%
Revenue1.7B2.85B60%
Total Cash190M1.67B11%
Total Debt930M281M331%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACIW vs HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
ACIW
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
237
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4970
SMR RATING
1..100
4792
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4981
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8077
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACIW's Valuation (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ACIW’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

ACIW's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (70) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ACIW’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

ACIW's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (92) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ACIW’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

ACIW's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (81) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ACIW’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ACIW (80) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to ACIW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACIWHUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACIW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMF41.381.55
+3.89%
Direxion Daily 20+ Yr Trsy Bull 3X ETF
SGDM56.490.82
+1.47%
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
CRPT20.110.12
+0.58%
First Trust SkyBdg Cry Idt & Dgt Eco ETF
UXI44.570.14
+0.31%
ProShares Ultra Industrials
CGUI25.33N/A
-0.01%
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF

ACIW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACIW has been loosely correlated with CPAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACIW jumps, then CPAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACIW
1D Price
Change %
ACIW100%
+1.91%
CPAY - ACIW
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
HUBS - ACIW
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
EEFT - ACIW
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
QTWO - ACIW
55%
Loosely correlated
+6.64%
ROP - ACIW
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
More

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
+2.26%
CRM - HUBS
72%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
TEAM - HUBS
72%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
NOW - HUBS
69%
Closely correlated
+2.79%
S - HUBS
67%
Closely correlated
-1.60%
FRSH - HUBS
66%
Closely correlated
+2.34%
More