ACITF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
3.83M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MTTWF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
2.19B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACITF vs MTTWF

Header iconACITF vs MTTWF Comparison
Open Charts ACITF vs MTTWFBanner chart's image
Asian Citrus Holdings
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$222
Capitalization3.83M
METRO AG
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.19B
ACITF vs MTTWF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACITF vs. MTTWF commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACITF is a Hold and MTTWF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (ACITF: $0.20 vs. MTTWF: $6.18)
Brand notoriety: ACITF and MTTWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACITF: 100% vs. MTTWF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ACITF: $3.83M vs. MTTWF: $2.19B
ACITF [@Food Distributors] is valued at $3.83M. MTTWF’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $2.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $35.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $4.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACITF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTTWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACITF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTTWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTTWF is a better buy in the long-term than ACITF.

Price Growth

ACITF (@Food Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MTTWF (@Food Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (-1.09% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTTWF($2.19B) has a higher market cap than ACITF($3.83M). MTTWF YTD gains are higher at: 16.165 vs. ACITF (-80.769).
ACITFMTTWFACITF / MTTWF
Capitalization3.83M2.19B0%
EBITDAN/A1.02B-
Gain YTD-80.76916.165-500%
P/E RatioN/A4.14-
RevenueN/A31.5B-
Total CashN/A1.63B-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTTWF: Fundamental Ratings
MTTWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
41
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACITFMTTWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WWR1.050.08
+8.15%
Westwater Resources
NI41.690.36
+0.87%
NiSource
CAN0.92-0.02
-1.75%
Canaan
EEIQ0.32-0.01
-1.79%
EpicQuest Education Group International Limited
RH153.31-3.91
-2.49%
RH

MTTWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTTWF and DIT have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTTWF and DIT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTTWF
1D Price
Change %
MTTWF100%
N/A
DIT - MTTWF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SYY - MTTWF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
CHEF - MTTWF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
CVGW - MTTWF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%
UNFI - MTTWF
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.47%
More