ACITF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.84 (-80.77%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.64M
MCSHF
Price
$2.44
Change
-$0.09 (-3.56%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
2.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACITF vs MCSHF

Header iconACITF vs MCSHF Comparison
Open Charts ACITF vs MCSHFBanner chart's image
Asian Citrus Holdings
Price$0.20
Change-$0.84 (-80.77%)
Volume$222
Capitalization3.64M
Metcash
Price$2.44
Change-$0.09 (-3.56%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.76B
ACITF vs MCSHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACITF vs. MCSHF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACITF is a Hold and MCSHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (ACITF: $0.20 vs. MCSHF: $2.44)
Brand notoriety: ACITF and MCSHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACITF: 100% vs. MCSHF: 39%
Market capitalization -- ACITF: $3.64M vs. MCSHF: $2.76B
ACITF [@Food Distributors] is valued at $3.64M. MCSHF’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $2.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $39.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $4.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACITF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCSHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACITF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCSHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCSHF is a better buy in the long-term than ACITF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCSHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MCSHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

ACITF (@Food Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MCSHF (@Food Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was +3.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (+3.33% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCSHF($2.76B) has a higher market cap than ACITF($3.64M). MCSHF YTD gains are higher at: 10.158 vs. ACITF (-80.769).
ACITFMCSHFACITF / MCSHF
Capitalization3.64M2.76B0%
EBITDAN/A640M-
Gain YTD-80.76910.158-795%
P/E RatioN/A14.36-
RevenueN/A16.5B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCSHF: Fundamental Ratings
MCSHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65
SMR RATING
1..100
79
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACITFMCSHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IIGCX18.120.42
+2.37%
VanEck International Investors Gold C
FSOPX15.760.21
+1.35%
Fidelity Series Small Cap Opps
DNLYX62.470.71
+1.15%
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Y
DRECX41.200.32
+0.78%
Davis Real Estate C
RICAX65.660.30
+0.46%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer R1

ACITF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACITF and MTTWF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACITF and MTTWF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACITF
1D Price
Change %
ACITF100%
N/A
MTTWF - ACITF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCLE - ACITF
0%
Poorly correlated
-6.25%
OGOFF - ACITF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KARNF - ACITF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCSHF - ACITF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCSHF and OGOFF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCSHF and OGOFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCSHF
1D Price
Change %
MCSHF100%
N/A
OGOFF - MCSHF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JRONY - MCSHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
MTTWF - MCSHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KARNF - MCSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVO - MCSHF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
More