ACITF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.84 (-80.77%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
26.49M
CERGF
Price
$4.35
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
55.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACITF vs CERGF

Header iconACITF vs CERGF Comparison
Open Charts ACITF vs CERGFBanner chart's image
Asian Citrus Holdings
Price$0.20
Change-$0.84 (-80.77%)
Volume$222
Capitalization26.49M
Ceres Global Ag
Price$4.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.2K
Capitalization55.14M
ACITF vs CERGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CERGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACITF vs. CERGF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACITF is a Hold and CERGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ACITF: $0.20 vs. CERGF: $4.35)
Brand notoriety: ACITF and CERGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACITF: 27% vs. CERGF: 73%
Market capitalization -- ACITF: $26.49M vs. CERGF: $55.14M
ACITF [@Food Distributors] is valued at $26.49M. CERGF’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $55.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $40.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACITF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCERGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACITF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CERGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CERGF is a better buy in the long-term than ACITF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACITF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CERGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACITF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • CERGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CERGF is a better buy in the short-term than ACITF.

Price Growth

ACITF (@Food Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CERGF (@Food Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was +3.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (+3.10% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CERGF($55.1M) has a higher market cap than ACITF($26.5M). ACITF has higher P/E ratio than CERGF: ACITF (106.38) vs CERGF (3.05). CERGF YTD gains are higher at: 103.271 vs. ACITF (-80.769). ACITF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.3M vs. CERGF (-13.91M). ACITF has more cash in the bank: 63.1M vs. CERGF (7.12M). ACITF has less debt than CERGF: ACITF (556K) vs CERGF (66.9M). CERGF has higher revenues than ACITF: CERGF (1.11B) vs ACITF (166M).
ACITFCERGFACITF / CERGF
Capitalization26.5M55.1M48%
EBITDA10.3M-13.91M-74%
Gain YTD-80.769103.271-78%
P/E Ratio106.383.053,486%
Revenue166M1.11B15%
Total Cash63.1M7.12M886%
Total Debt556K66.9M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CERGF: Fundamental Ratings
CERGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACITFCERGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CERGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRKZF21.96N/A
N/A
Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA
LTOUF36.21N/A
N/A
Larsen & Toubro Ltd.
ORGJF53.03N/A
N/A
Organo Corp.
MGMNF1.28-0.04
-2.70%
Magna Mining Inc.
PTNT0.15N/A
-3.23%
Palatin Technologies Inc.

ACITF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACITF and MTTWF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACITF and MTTWF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACITF
1D Price
Change %
ACITF100%
N/A
MTTWF - ACITF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCLE - ACITF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OGOFF - ACITF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KARNF - ACITF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CERGF - ACITF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CERGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CERGF and JRONY have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CERGF and JRONY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CERGF
1D Price
Change %
CERGF100%
N/A
JRONY - CERGF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
MCLE - CERGF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OGOFF - CERGF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTTWF - CERGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KARNF - CERGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More