It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACHC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHCA’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACHC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ACHC (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а -20.63% price change this week, while HCA (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +0.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -2.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.64%.
ACHC is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
HCA is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.
Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.
| ACHC | HCA | ACHC / HCA | |
| Capitalization | 1.46B | 108B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 498M | 14.4B | 3% |
| Gain YTD | -59.445 | 58.738 | -101% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.87 | 18.30 | 76% |
| Revenue | 3.23B | 72.7B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 131M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.39B | 46.4B | 5% |
ACHC | HCA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 17 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HCA's Valuation (18) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACHC (57) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that HCA’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACHC’s over the last 12 months.
HCA's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACHC (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that HCA’s stock grew significantly faster than ACHC’s over the last 12 months.
HCA's SMR Rating (42) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACHC (85) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that HCA’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACHC’s over the last 12 months.
HCA's Price Growth Rating (17) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACHC (90) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that HCA’s stock grew significantly faster than ACHC’s over the last 12 months.
HCA's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as ACHC (34) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that HCA’s stock grew similarly to ACHC’s over the last 12 months.
| ACHC | HCA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 3 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 3 days ago 62% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CGCV | 30.44 | 0.07 | +0.23% |
| Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF | |||
| CSHI | 49.82 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| NEOS Enhanced Inc 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | |||
| COM | 29.63 | N/A | -0.01% |
| Direxion Auspice Broad Cmdty Strat ETF | |||
| XLP | 77.32 | -0.11 | -0.14% |
| The Consumer Staples Sel SectSPDR® ETF | |||
| LDEM | 59.66 | -0.09 | -0.14% |
| iShares® ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACHC has been loosely correlated with UHS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACHC jumps, then UHS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACHC | 100% | -7.64% | ||
| UHS - ACHC | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| ASTH - ACHC | 48% Loosely correlated | -7.00% | ||
| HCA - ACHC | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| DVA - ACHC | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| ENSG - ACHC | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCA has been closely correlated with UHS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCA jumps, then UHS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCA | 100% | +2.44% | ||
| UHS - HCA | 81% Closely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| THC - HCA | 73% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| ENSG - HCA | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| ARDT - HCA | 52% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CYH - HCA | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
More | ||||