ACHC
Price
$13.17
Change
-$0.38 (-2.80%)
Updated
Feb 5, 02:19 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.23B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FMS
Price
$24.11
Change
+$0.30 (+1.26%)
Updated
Feb 5, 02:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.8B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACHC vs FMS

Header iconACHC vs FMS Comparison
Open Charts ACHC vs FMSBanner chart's image
Acadia Healthcare
Price$13.17
Change-$0.38 (-2.80%)
Volume$2.04K
Capitalization1.23B
Fresenius Medical Care AG
Price$24.11
Change+$0.30 (+1.26%)
Volume$468
Capitalization13.8B
ACHC vs FMS Comparison Chart in %
ACHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACHC vs. FMS commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACHC is a Hold and FMS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (ACHC: $13.55 vs. FMS: $23.81)
Brand notoriety: ACHC and FMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACHC: 126% vs. FMS: 116%
Market capitalization -- ACHC: $1.23B vs. FMS: $13.8B
ACHC [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $1.23B. FMS’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $13.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $112.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACHC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMS is a better buy in the long-term than ACHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACHC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACHC is a better buy in the short-term than FMS.

Price Growth

ACHC (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а +0.82% price change this week, while FMS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +7.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACHC is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

FMS is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (-0.23% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMS($13.8B) has a higher market cap than ACHC($1.23B). FMS has higher P/E ratio than ACHC: FMS (16.52) vs ACHC (11.69). FMS YTD gains are higher at: -0.042 vs. ACHC (-4.510). FMS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.17B vs. ACHC (456M). FMS has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. ACHC (119M). ACHC has less debt than FMS: ACHC (2.43B) vs FMS (10.5B). FMS has higher revenues than ACHC: FMS (19.6B) vs ACHC (3.27B).
ACHCFMSACHC / FMS
Capitalization1.23B13.8B9%
EBITDA456M3.17B14%
Gain YTD-4.510-0.04210,743%
P/E Ratio11.6916.5271%
Revenue3.27B19.6B17%
Total Cash119M1.81B7%
Total Debt2.43B10.5B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACHC vs FMS: Fundamental Ratings
ACHC
FMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
614
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8683
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8673
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7475
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMS's Valuation (4) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACHC (53). This means that FMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACHC’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as ACHC (100). This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to ACHC’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's SMR Rating (83) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as ACHC (86). This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to ACHC’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's Price Growth Rating (73) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as ACHC (86). This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to ACHC’s over the last 12 months.

ACHC's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as FMS (75). This means that ACHC’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACHCFMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAPI27.890.44
+1.60%
Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF
AZNH53.28N/A
N/A
ASTRAZENECA PLC ADRHEDGED AZNH
PJAN47.21-0.08
-0.18%
Innovator US Equity Power Buff ETF™ Jan
PBJL30.05-0.06
-0.20%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Jul
KGRN26.73-0.17
-0.63%
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Tech ETF

ACHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACHC has been loosely correlated with UHS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACHC jumps, then UHS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACHC
1D Price
Change %
ACHC100%
-0.95%
UHS - ACHC
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
AUNA - ACHC
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
ASTH - ACHC
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.52%
DVA - ACHC
42%
Loosely correlated
+5.44%
PNTG - ACHC
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
More

FMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMS has been loosely correlated with FSNUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMS jumps, then FSNUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMS
1D Price
Change %
FMS100%
+3.61%
FSNUY - FMS
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
ACHC - FMS
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
DNTCF - FMS
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CON - FMS
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
USPH - FMS
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
More