ACGLN
Price
$18.02
Change
+$0.02 (+0.11%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:41 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
ESGRF
Price
$23.83
Change
+$0.03 (+0.13%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACGLN vs ESGRF

Header iconACGLN vs ESGRF Comparison
Open Charts ACGLN vs ESGRFBanner chart's image
Arch Capital Group
Price$18.02
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
Volume$210
CapitalizationN/A
Enstar Group
Price$23.83
Change+$0.03 (+0.13%)
Volume$995.02K
CapitalizationN/A
ACGLN vs ESGRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACGLN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACGLN vs. ESGRF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGLN is a Buy and ESGRF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ACGLN: $18.00 vs. ESGRF: $23.83)
Brand notoriety: ACGLN and ESGRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACGLN: 47% vs. ESGRF: 434%
Market capitalization -- ACGLN: $0 vs. ESGRF: $0
ACGLN [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $0. ESGRF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $32.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACGLN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileESGRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ACGLN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ESGRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESGRF is a better buy in the long-term than ACGLN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACGLN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESGRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACGLN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ESGRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ACGLN and ESGRF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ACGLN (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -0.66% price change this week, while ESGRF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -0.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-0.64% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESGRF YTD gains are higher at: 19.211 vs. ACGLN (5.648). ESGRF has less debt than ACGLN: ESGRF (1.95B) vs ACGLN (2.73B).
ACGLNESGRFACGLN / ESGRF
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.64819.21129%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.73B1.95B140%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESGRF: Fundamental Ratings
ESGRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
95
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
30
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACGLNESGRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
28%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACGLN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARMK38.410.75
+1.99%
ARAMARK
BOTJ15.750.18
+1.16%
Bank of the James Financial Group
GSHD74.870.10
+0.13%
Goosehead Insurance
GBLI28.99N/A
N/A
Global Indemnity Group LLC
CAPNU10.45N/A
N/A
Cayson Acquisition Corp

ACGLN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGLN has been closely correlated with ACGLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACGLN jumps, then ACGLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGLN
1D Price
Change %
ACGLN100%
+0.11%
ACGLO - ACGLN
85%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
BNT - ACGLN
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
ACGL - ACGLN
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
AEG - ACGLN
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
ORI - ACGLN
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
More

ESGRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESGRF has been closely correlated with ESGOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESGRF jumps, then ESGOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESGRF
1D Price
Change %
ESGRF100%
N/A
ESGOF - ESGRF
77%
Closely correlated
N/A
ACGLO - ESGRF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
ACGLN - ESGRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
FIHL - ESGRF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
SLF - ESGRF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
More