ACGL
Price
$101.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
95 days until earnings call
SLF
Price
$61.06
Change
+$0.84 (+1.39%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
89 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ACGL vs SLF

Header iconACGL vs SLF Comparison
Open Charts ACGL vs SLFBanner chart's image
Arch Capital Group
Price$101.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.74M
CapitalizationN/A
Sun Life Financial
Price$61.06
Change+$0.84 (+1.39%)
Volume$1.24M
CapitalizationN/A
ACGL vs SLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ACGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACGL vs. SLF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGL is a StrongBuy and SLF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (ACGL: $101.18 vs. SLF: $60.22)
Brand notoriety: ACGL and SLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACGL: 95% vs. SLF: 219%
Market capitalization -- ACGL: $34.59B vs. SLF: $31.65B
ACGL [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $34.59B. SLF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $31.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACGL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACGL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLF is a better buy in the long-term than ACGL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACGL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACGL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACGL is a better buy in the short-term than SLF.

Price Growth

ACGL (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -0.51% price change this week, while SLF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +2.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACGL is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.

SLF is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-0.42% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACGL($34.6B) has a higher market cap than SLF($31.6B). SLF has higher P/E ratio than ACGL: SLF (13.86) vs ACGL (7.94). ACGL YTD gains are higher at: 36.233 vs. SLF (16.120). SLF has more cash in the bank: 27.5B vs. ACGL (8.03B). ACGL has less debt than SLF: ACGL (2.73B) vs SLF (13.3B). SLF has higher revenues than ACGL: SLF (32.7B) vs ACGL (13.3B).
ACGLSLFACGL / SLF
Capitalization34.6B31.6B109%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD36.23316.120225%
P/E Ratio7.9413.8657%
Revenue13.3B32.7B41%
Total Cash8.03B27.5B29%
Total Debt2.73B13.3B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACGL vs SLF: Fundamental Ratings
ACGL
SLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7222
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1151
SMR RATING
1..100
8798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9140
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLF's Valuation (31) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACGL (82) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACGL’s over the last 12 months.

ACGL's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLF (51) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that ACGL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLF’s over the last 12 months.

ACGL's SMR Rating (87) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SLF (98) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that ACGL’s stock grew similarly to SLF’s over the last 12 months.

SLF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as ACGL (58) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew similarly to ACGL’s over the last 12 months.

SLF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACGL (91) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACGL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACGLSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ACGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

ACGL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACGL and ORI have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACGL and ORI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGL
1D Price
Change %
ACGL100%
+0.06%
ORI - ACGL
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
EQH - ACGL
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
IGIC - ACGL
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
AIG - ACGL
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
SLF - ACGL
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
More

SLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLF has been loosely correlated with FIHL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLF jumps, then FIHL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLF
1D Price
Change %
SLF100%
+0.62%
FIHL - SLF
35%
Loosely correlated
+7.96%
ESGR - SLF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIG - SLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
AVVIY - SLF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
EQH - SLF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
More