ACGL
Price
$95.51
Change
-$0.59 (-0.61%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
34.59B
23 days until earnings call
FIHL
Price
$16.63
Change
-$0.07 (-0.42%)
Updated
Jan 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.26B
40 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ACGL vs FIHL

Header iconACGL vs FIHL Comparison
Open Charts ACGL vs FIHLBanner chart's image
Arch Capital Group
Price$95.51
Change-$0.59 (-0.61%)
Volume$4.62M
Capitalization34.59B
Fidelis Insurance Holdings
Price$16.63
Change-$0.07 (-0.42%)
Volume$3.8K
Capitalization2.26B
ACGL vs FIHL Comparison Chart
Loading...
ACGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACGL vs. FIHL commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGL is a Hold and FIHL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ACGL: $96.10 vs. FIHL: $16.70)
Brand notoriety: ACGL and FIHL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACGL: 98% vs. FIHL: 57%
Market capitalization -- ACGL: $34.59B vs. FIHL: $2.26B
ACGL [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $34.59B. FIHL’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $2.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACGL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFIHL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACGL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FIHL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FIHL is a better buy in the long-term than ACGL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACGL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FIHL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACGL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FIHL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FIHL is a better buy in the short-term than ACGL.

Price Growth

ACGL (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +3.71% price change this week, while FIHL (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACGL is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

FIHL is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+2.42% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACGL($34.6B) has a higher market cap than FIHL($2.26B). ACGL has higher P/E ratio than FIHL: ACGL (7.94) vs FIHL (1.03). ACGL YTD gains are higher at: 4.061 vs. FIHL (-7.887). ACGL has more cash in the bank: 8.03B vs. FIHL (4.01B). FIHL has less debt than ACGL: FIHL (448M) vs ACGL (2.73B). ACGL has higher revenues than FIHL: ACGL (13.3B) vs FIHL (3.59B).
ACGLFIHLACGL / FIHL
Capitalization34.6B2.26B1,529%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.061-7.887-51%
P/E Ratio7.941.03770%
Revenue13.3B3.59B370%
Total Cash8.03B4.01B200%
Total Debt2.73B448M608%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACGL: Fundamental Ratings
ACGL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
18
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACGLFIHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ACGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY591.64-1.14
-0.19%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X99756.910000-747.585940
-0.74%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.72-0.24
-0.86%
GameStop Corp
TSLA413.82-14.40
-3.36%
Tesla
AAPL228.26-9.61
-4.04%
Apple

ACGL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGL has been loosely correlated with ORI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACGL jumps, then ORI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGL
1D Price
Change %
ACGL100%
+2.65%
ORI - ACGL
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.59%
AIG - ACGL
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
EQH - ACGL
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
FIHL - ACGL
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
IGIC - ACGL
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
More

FIHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIHL has been loosely correlated with AIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIHL jumps, then AIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FIHL
1D Price
Change %
FIHL100%
+0.24%
AIG - FIHL
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
ORI - FIHL
33%
Loosely correlated
+2.59%
AVVIY - FIHL
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
ACGL - FIHL
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
EQH - FIHL
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
More