ACGBY
Price
$17.50
Change
+$0.17 (+0.98%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
347.9B
BACHY
Price
$13.91
Change
+$0.05 (+0.36%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
230.82B
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACGBY vs BACHY

Header iconACGBY vs BACHY Comparison
Open Charts ACGBY vs BACHYBanner chart's image
Agricultural Bank of China
Price$17.50
Change+$0.17 (+0.98%)
Volume$12.38K
Capitalization347.9B
Bank of China
Price$13.91
Change+$0.05 (+0.36%)
Volume$47.61K
Capitalization230.82B
ACGBY vs BACHY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BACHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACGBY vs. BACHY commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGBY is a Buy and BACHY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ACGBY: $17.50 vs. BACHY: $13.91)
Brand notoriety: ACGBY and BACHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACGBY: 39% vs. BACHY: 92%
Market capitalization -- ACGBY: $347.9B vs. BACHY: $230.82B
ACGBY [@Major Banks] is valued at $347.9B. BACHY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $230.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $809.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $133.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACGBY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBACHY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ACGBY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BACHY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACGBY is a better buy in the long-term than BACHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACGBY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BACHY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACGBY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BACHY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACGBY is a better buy in the short-term than BACHY.

Price Growth

ACGBY (@Major Banks) experienced а +4.39% price change this week, while BACHY (@Major Banks) price change was +1.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +128.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

BACHY is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.01% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACGBY($348B) has a higher market cap than BACHY($231B). ACGBY has higher P/E ratio than BACHY: ACGBY (6.66) vs BACHY (5.30). ACGBY YTD gains are higher at: 32.809 vs. BACHY (17.573).
ACGBYBACHYACGBY / BACHY
Capitalization348B231B151%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD32.80917.573187%
P/E Ratio6.665.30126%
RevenueN/A633B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A2.39T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACGBY vs BACHY: Fundamental Ratings
ACGBY
BACHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4556
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1526
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACGBY's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHY (91). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to BACHY’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHY (6). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to BACHY’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHY (1). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to BACHY’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHY (56). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to BACHY’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHY (26). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to BACHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACGBYBACHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
30%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BACHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KAPA1.720.17
+10.97%
Kairos Pharma Ltd.
CLLS2.680.05
+1.90%
Cellectis SA
CRUS115.720.46
+0.40%
Cirrus Logic
NEOG5.750.01
+0.17%
Neogen Corp
MDT92.900.05
+0.05%
Medtronic plc

ACGBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGBY has been loosely correlated with IDCBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACGBY jumps, then IDCBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGBY
1D Price
Change %
ACGBY100%
+0.95%
IDCBY - ACGBY
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
CICHY - ACGBY
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
BACHY - ACGBY
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
NABZY - ACGBY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
CICHF - ACGBY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
More

BACHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BACHY has been closely correlated with CICHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BACHY jumps, then CICHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BACHY
1D Price
Change %
BACHY100%
+0.36%
CICHY - BACHY
82%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
IDCBY - BACHY
81%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
ACGBY - BACHY
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
MBFJF - BACHY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
SCBFY - BACHY
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
More