ACGBF
Price
$0.76
Change
+$0.02 (+2.70%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
173.61B
BACHY
Price
$14.63
Change
-$0.06 (-0.41%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
146.84B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACGBF vs BACHY

Header iconACGBF vs BACHY Comparison
Open Charts ACGBF vs BACHYBanner chart's image
Agricultural Bank of China
Price$0.76
Change+$0.02 (+2.70%)
Volume$400
Capitalization173.61B
Bank of China
Price$14.63
Change-$0.06 (-0.41%)
Volume$34.72K
Capitalization146.84B
ACGBF vs BACHY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACGBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BACHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACGBF vs. BACHY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGBF is a Buy and BACHY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ACGBF: $0.76 vs. BACHY: $14.63)
Brand notoriety: ACGBF and BACHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACGBF: 1% vs. BACHY: 82%
Market capitalization -- ACGBF: $173.61B vs. BACHY: $146.84B
ACGBF [@Major Banks] is valued at $173.61B. BACHY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $146.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACGBF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileBACHY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ACGBF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • BACHY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ACGBF and BACHY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACGBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BACHY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACGBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • BACHY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BACHY is a better buy in the short-term than ACGBF.

Price Growth

ACGBF (@Major Banks) experienced а +2.17% price change this week, while BACHY (@Major Banks) price change was -2.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

BACHY is expected to report earnings on Aug 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.55% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACGBF($174B) has a higher market cap than BACHY($147B). BACHY (3.54) and ACGBF (3.52) have similar P/E ratio . ACGBF YTD gains are higher at: 35.464 vs. BACHY (23.659). ACGBF has higher revenues than BACHY: ACGBF (729B) vs BACHY (635B).
ACGBFBACHYACGBF / BACHY
Capitalization174B147B118%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD35.46423.659150%
P/E Ratio3.523.5499%
Revenue729B635B115%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.25TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACGBF vs BACHY: Fundamental Ratings
ACGBF
BACHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
145
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3847
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1539
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACGBF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHY (24). This means that ACGBF’s stock grew similarly to BACHY’s over the last 12 months.

BACHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBF (14). This means that BACHY’s stock grew similarly to ACGBF’s over the last 12 months.

BACHY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBF (1). This means that BACHY’s stock grew similarly to ACGBF’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHY (47). This means that ACGBF’s stock grew similarly to BACHY’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as BACHY (39). This means that ACGBF’s stock grew similarly to BACHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACGBFBACHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
33%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACGBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BACHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ATXS5.810.08
+1.40%
Astria Therapeutics
WAL85.100.92
+1.09%
Western Alliance Bancorporation
SITIF3.08N/A
N/A
SITC International Holdings Company, Ltd.
AHCO9.32-0.05
-0.53%
AdaptHealth Corp
HYFM3.63-0.10
-2.68%
Hydrofarm Holdings Group Inc.

ACGBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACGBF and ABMRF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACGBF and ABMRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGBF
1D Price
Change %
ACGBF100%
+2.17%
ABMRF - ACGBF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACGBY - ACGBF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.09%
BACHY - ACGBF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
AGRPF - ACGBF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCSO - ACGBF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BACHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BACHY has been closely correlated with CICHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BACHY jumps, then CICHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BACHY
1D Price
Change %
BACHY100%
-0.44%
CICHY - BACHY
82%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
IDCBY - BACHY
81%
Closely correlated
-1.29%
ACGBY - BACHY
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.09%
MBFJF - BACHY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCBFY - BACHY
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
More