ACGBF
Price
$0.65
Change
-$0.03 (-4.48%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
325.98B
ACGBY
Price
$17.15
Change
-$0.35 (-2.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
325.98B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACGBF vs ACGBY

Header iconACGBF vs ACGBY Comparison
Open Charts ACGBF vs ACGBYBanner chart's image
Agricultural Bank of China
Price$0.65
Change-$0.03 (-4.48%)
Volume$10.81K
Capitalization325.98B
Agricultural Bank of China
Price$17.15
Change-$0.35 (-2.00%)
Volume$38.99K
Capitalization325.98B
ACGBF vs ACGBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACGBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ACGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACGBF vs. ACGBY commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGBF is a Hold and ACGBY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (ACGBF: $0.64 vs. ACGBY: $17.15)
Brand notoriety: ACGBF and ACGBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACGBF: 17% vs. ACGBY: 162%
Market capitalization -- ACGBF: $325.98B vs. ACGBY: $325.98B
ACGBF [@Major Banks] is valued at $325.98B. ACGBY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $325.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $798.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $133.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACGBF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileACGBY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ACGBF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • ACGBY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACGBF is a better buy in the long-term than ACGBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACGBF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ACGBY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACGBF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ACGBY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACGBY is a better buy in the short-term than ACGBF.

Price Growth

ACGBF (@Major Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ACGBY (@Major Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+2.52% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACGBF($326B) and ACGBY($326B) have the same market capitalization . ACGBY has higher P/E ratio than ACGBF: ACGBY (6.56) vs ACGBF (6.17). ACGBY YTD gains are higher at: 30.190 vs. ACGBF (15.179).
ACGBFACGBYACGBF / ACGBY
Capitalization326B326B100%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.17930.19050%
P/E Ratio6.176.5694%
Revenue711BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.55TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACGBF vs ACGBY: Fundamental Ratings
ACGBF
ACGBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9465
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
276
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1717
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACGBF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBY (67). This means that ACGBF’s stock grew similarly to ACGBY’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBF (27). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to ACGBF’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBF (1). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to ACGBF’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBF (49). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to ACGBF’s over the last 12 months.

ACGBY's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGBF (17). This means that ACGBY’s stock grew similarly to ACGBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACGBFACGBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACGBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ACGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCEC21.370.44
+2.08%
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp
UPST64.090.26
+0.41%
Upstart Holdings
ACN247.010.85
+0.35%
Accenture PLC
FRST11.09-0.21
-1.86%
Primis Financial Corp
VBIX3.55-0.16
-4.31%
Viewbix Inc.

ACGBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACGBF and ABMRF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACGBF and ABMRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGBF
1D Price
Change %
ACGBF100%
N/A
ABMRF - ACGBF
5%
Poorly correlated
+10.23%
ACGBY - ACGBF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
BACHY - ACGBF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
AGRPF - ACGBF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCSO - ACGBF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ACGBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGBY has been loosely correlated with IDCBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACGBY jumps, then IDCBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGBY
1D Price
Change %
ACGBY100%
-2.00%
IDCBY - ACGBY
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
CICHY - ACGBY
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.93%
BACHY - ACGBY
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
NABZY - ACGBY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
CICHF - ACGBY
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.51%
More