Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACFSX vs RGACX
ACFSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ACFSX vs RGACX
American Century Focused Dynamic Gr I
Price$77.85
Change+$0.21 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
ACFSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACFSX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACFSX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. ACFSX (1.95B). RGACX pays higher dividends than ACFSX: RGACX (0.07) vs ACFSX (0.00). ACFSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ACFSX (19 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than ACFSX (0.66). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ACFSX (8.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACFSX: RGACX (250) vs ACFSX (5000000). ACFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.85 vs. RGACX (14.08). ACFSX return over 5 years is better than : 72.58 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| ACFSX | RGACX | ACFSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.94 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.94 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.098 | 14.044 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.95B | 329B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.85 | 14.08 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.12 | 41.19 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.58 | 41.95 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 367.33 | 83.68 | 439% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement