Advertisement
ACFN vs USBC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACFN is a Hold and USBC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACFN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUSBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ACFN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- USBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACFN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USBC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACFN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- USBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ACFN (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а -1.16% price change this week, while USBC (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was -17.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was +2.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +49.16%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (+2.84% weekly)This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
| ACFN | USBC | ACFN / USBC | |
| Capitalization | 62.7M | 358M | 18% |
| EBITDA | 3.35M | -9.94M | -34% |
| Gain YTD | 48.127 | 429.925 | 11% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.80 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 13.2M | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 3.25M | 173K | 1,880% |
| Total Debt | 1.06M | 3.88M | 27% |
ACFN | USBC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 10 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
USBC's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as ACFN (59). This means that USBC’s stock grew similarly to ACFN’s over the last 12 months.
ACFN's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for USBC (100). This means that ACFN’s stock grew significantly faster than USBC’s over the last 12 months.
ACFN's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for USBC (100). This means that ACFN’s stock grew significantly faster than USBC’s over the last 12 months.
USBC's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as ACFN (38). This means that USBC’s stock grew similarly to ACFN’s over the last 12 months.
USBC's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ACFN (100). This means that USBC’s stock grew similarly to ACFN’s over the last 12 months.
| ACFN | USBC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 85% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% | 8 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 76% | 21 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 85% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 74% | 8 days ago 89% |
Advertisement
ACFN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACFN and GNSS have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACFN and GNSS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACFN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACFN | 100% | +4.41% | ||
| GNSS - ACFN | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
| BKSY - ACFN | 10% Poorly correlated | +5.41% | ||
| ITRN - ACFN | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.34% | ||
| MKSI - ACFN | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| TDY - ACFN | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||
USBC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that USBC and VNT have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USBC and VNT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USBC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USBC | 100% | +3.40% | ||
| VNT - USBC | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.69% | ||
| SVRE - USBC | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FTV - USBC | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
| FCUV - USBC | 0% Poorly correlated | +12.11% | ||
| ACFN - USBC | 0% Poorly correlated | +4.41% | ||
More | ||||