Advertisement
ACFN vs GNSS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACFN is a Hold and GNSS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACFN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGNSS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ACFN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- GNSS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACFN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GNSS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACFN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- GNSS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ACFN (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а -9.04% price change this week, while GNSS (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was +14.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
GNSS is expected to report earnings on Dec 15, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (+0.32% weekly)This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
| ACFN | GNSS | ACFN / GNSS | |
| Capitalization | 62.9M | 83.5M | 75% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -21.01M | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.637 | -28.846 | -141% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.83 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 27.8M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 7.08M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 16.6M | - |
ACFN | GNSS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 10 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ACFN's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as GNSS (91). This means that ACFN’s stock grew similarly to GNSS’s over the last 12 months.
ACFN's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GNSS (100). This means that ACFN’s stock grew significantly faster than GNSS’s over the last 12 months.
ACFN's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GNSS (99). This means that ACFN’s stock grew significantly faster than GNSS’s over the last 12 months.
ACFN's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as GNSS (64). This means that ACFN’s stock grew similarly to GNSS’s over the last 12 months.
GNSS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACFN (100). This means that GNSS’s stock grew significantly faster than ACFN’s over the last 12 months.
| ACFN | GNSS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 19 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
ACFN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACFN and GNSS have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACFN and GNSS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACFN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACFN | 100% | -10.43% | ||
| GNSS - ACFN | 10% Poorly correlated | +12.80% | ||
| BKSY - ACFN | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ITRN - ACFN | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
| MKSI - ACFN | 9% Poorly correlated | -4.31% | ||
| TDY - ACFN | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
More | ||||
GNSS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GNSS and FTV have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GNSS and FTV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GNSS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNSS | 100% | +12.80% | ||
| FTV - GNSS | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.75% | ||
| ST - GNSS | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.97% | ||
| TRMB - GNSS | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.71% | ||
| COHR - GNSS | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.91% | ||
| MKSI - GNSS | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.31% | ||
More | ||||