Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEYX vs MICDX
ACEYX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts ACEYX vs MICDX
AB All China Equity Advisor
Price$9.64
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.33M
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$14.12
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
ACEYX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEYX vs. MICDX commentary
Jul 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEYX is a Hold and MICDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICDX has more cash in the bank: 90.4M vs. ACEYX (51.3M). MICDX (3.37) and ACEYX (3.27) have matching dividends . ACEYX was incepted earlier than MICDX: ACEYX (7 years) vs MICDX (15 years). ACEYX (1.60) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). ACEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MICDX (75.80). ACEYX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: ACEYX (0) vs MICDX (100000). MICDX (39.62) and ACEYX (37.74) have marching annual gain over last year. MICDX return over 5 years is better than : -4.96 vs. ACEYX (-9.52).
| ACEYX | MICDX | ACEYX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.19 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.19 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.954 | 21.912 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.3M | 90.4M | 57% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.27 | 3.37 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.74 | 39.62 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.89 | 12.08 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.52 | -4.96 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 26.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement