Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEYX vs GSAFX
ACEYX vs GSAFX Comparison
Open Charts ACEYX vs GSAFX
AB All China Equity Advisor
Price$9.55
Change-$0.05 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.1M
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$25.46
Change-$0.19 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.87M
ACEYX vs GSAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEYX vs. GSAFX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEYX is a Buy and GSAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACEYX has more cash in the bank: 51.1M vs. GSAFX (36.9M). ACEYX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: ACEYX (3.27) vs GSAFX (1.38). ACEYX was incepted earlier than GSAFX: ACEYX (7 years) vs GSAFX (7 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than ACEYX (1.60). ACEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. GSAFX (70.00). ACEYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: ACEYX (0) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.09 vs. ACEYX (36.45). ACEYX return over 5 years is better than : -8.64 vs. GSAFX (-25.14).
| ACEYX | GSAFX | ACEYX / GSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.09 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.93 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.824 | 20.378 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.1M | 36.9M | 138% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.27 | 1.38 | 237% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.45 | 39.09 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.82 | -0.53 | -2,589% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.64 | -25.14 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers