Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEYX vs GSACX
ACEYX vs GSACX Comparison
Open Charts ACEYX vs GSACX
AB All China Equity Advisor
Price$10.94
Change+$0.08 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.43M
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$22.80
Change+$0.13 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.63M
ACEYX vs GSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEYX vs. GSACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEYX is a Hold and GSACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACEYX has more cash in the bank: 55.4M vs. GSACX (41.6M). ACEYX pays higher dividends than GSACX: ACEYX (2.77) vs GSACX (0.25). ACEYX was incepted earlier than GSACX: ACEYX (7 years) vs GSACX (28 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than ACEYX (1.60). ACEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. GSACX (70.00). ACEYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSACX: ACEYX (0) vs GSACX (1000). ACEYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.32 vs. GSACX (31.02). ACEYX return over 5 years is better than : -6.21 vs. GSACX (-34.27).
| ACEYX | GSACX | ACEYX / GSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 2.21 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 3.05 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.261 | 33.275 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 55.4M | 41.6M | 133% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.77 | 0.25 | 1,103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.32 | 31.02 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.42 | 32.53 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.21 | -34.27 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 22.61 | - |