Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEYX vs FHKAX
ACEYX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts ACEYX vs FHKAX
AB All China Equity Advisor
Price$9.55
Change-$0.05 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.1M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$46.52
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
ACEYX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEYX vs. FHKAX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEYX is a Buy and FHKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. ACEYX (51.1M). ACEYX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: ACEYX (3.27) vs FHKAX (1.07). ACEYX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: ACEYX (7 years) vs FHKAX (17 years). ACEYX (1.60) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). ACEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). ACEYX (0) and FHKAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ACEYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.45 vs. FHKAX (33.51). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.51 vs. ACEYX (-8.64).
| ACEYX | FHKAX | ACEYX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.18 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.18 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.824 | 21.272 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.1M | 1.24B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.27 | 1.07 | 305% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.45 | 33.51 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.82 | 42.06 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.64 | 3.51 | -246% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 55.35 | - |