Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWHX
ACEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWHX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$13.21
Change-$0.17 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.59M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.08
Change-$0.45 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
ACEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. ACEMX (20.6M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWHX (1.25) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.39 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWHX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). ACEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.29 vs. RNWHX (27.68). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. ACEMX (-7.34).
| ACEMX | RNWHX | ACEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 0.72 | 324% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 0.72 | 414% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.672 | 6.092 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.6M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.25 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.29 | 27.68 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.85 | 43.24 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.34 | 11.69 | -63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.45 | 124.21 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement