Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWHX
ACEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWHX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$12.04
Change-$0.17 (-1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.58M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.22
Change-$1.24 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
ACEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. ACEMX (19.6M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWHX (0.90) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWHX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.99 vs. ACEMX (19.09). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 24.39 vs. ACEMX (0.84).
| ACEMX | RNWHX | ACEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 0.72 | 324% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 0.72 | 414% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.607 | 26.572 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.6M | 76.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.90 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.09 | 20.99 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.50 | 48.72 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.84 | 24.39 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement