Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWHX
ACEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWHX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$12.07
Change-$0.12 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.14M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.23
Change-$0.78 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
ACEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. ACEMX (19.1M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWHX (0.91) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWHX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). RNWHX (19.18) and ACEMX (18.93) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 19.36 vs. ACEMX (-2.48).
| ACEMX | RNWHX | ACEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 0.72 | 324% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 0.72 | 414% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.134 | 27.611 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.1M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.91 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.93 | 19.18 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.43 | 47.28 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.48 | 19.36 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.34 | 103.97 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers