Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWFX
ACEMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWFX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$12.86
Change-$0.04 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.8M
American Funds New World R5
Price$97.34
Change-$0.26 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
ACEMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. ACEMX (19.8M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWFX (1.38) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWFX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). ACEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.03 vs. RNWFX (29.09). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.94 vs. ACEMX (-7.35).
| ACEMX | RNWFX | ACEMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 0.62 | 376% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 0.62 | 481% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.410 | 4.062 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.8M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.38 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.03 | 29.09 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.31 | 43.06 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.35 | 13.94 | -53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.34 | 124.76 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement