Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWFX
ACEMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWFX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$12.07
Change-$0.12 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.14M
American Funds New World R5
Price$97.89
Change-$0.78 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
ACEMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. ACEMX (19.1M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWFX (0.95) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWFX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). RNWFX (19.34) and ACEMX (18.93) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.96 vs. ACEMX (-2.48).
| ACEMX | RNWFX | ACEMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 0.62 | 376% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 0.62 | 481% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.134 | 27.712 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.1M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.95 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.93 | 19.34 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.43 | 47.68 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.48 | 19.96 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.34 | 106.80 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement