Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWFX
ACEMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWFX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$11.28
Change+$0.05 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.94M
American Funds New World R5
Price$91.55
Change+$0.20 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41B
ACEMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. ACEMX (17.9M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWFX (1.04) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWFX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.21 vs. ACEMX (9.62). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.26 vs. ACEMX (3.96).
| ACEMX | RNWFX | ACEMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 0.62 | 376% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 0.62 | 481% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.868 | 18.496 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.9M | 71.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.04 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.62 | 14.21 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.49 | 33.07 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.96 | 28.26 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.84 | 80.61 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement