Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWBX
ACEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWBX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$12.86
Change-$0.04 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.8M
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.37
Change+$0.08 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
ACEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. ACEMX (19.8M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWBX (0.48) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWBX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). ACEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.03 vs. RNWBX (27.43). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 8.49 vs. ACEMX (-7.35).
| ACEMX | RNWBX | ACEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 1.67 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 1.67 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.410 | 4.012 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.8M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.03 | 27.43 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.31 | 38.02 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.35 | 8.49 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.34 | 111.70 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement