Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWBX
ACEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWBX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$11.80
Change-$0.13 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.97M
American Funds New World R2
Price$89.58
Change-$0.46 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.06B
ACEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. ACEMX (19M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWBX (0.12) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWBX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). ACEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.81 vs. RNWBX (10.59). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.07 vs. ACEMX (4.47).
| ACEMX | RNWBX | ACEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 1.67 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 1.67 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.487 | 21.795 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19M | 74.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.81 | 10.59 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.13 | 56.54 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.47 | 23.07 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.16 | 82.92 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement