Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWBX
ACEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWBX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$12.07
Change-$0.12 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.14M
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.27
Change-$0.75 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
ACEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. ACEMX (19.1M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWBX (0.12) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWBX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). ACEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.93 vs. RNWBX (17.95). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 14.96 vs. ACEMX (-2.48).
| ACEMX | RNWBX | ACEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 1.67 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 1.67 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.134 | 26.472 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.1M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.93 | 17.95 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.43 | 44.38 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.48 | 14.96 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.34 | 97.25 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement