Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWAX
ACEMX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWAX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$13.21
Change-$0.17 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.59M
American Funds New World R1
Price$93.65
Change-$0.44 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
ACEMX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. ACEMX (20.6M). RNWAX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWAX (0.53) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.39 vs. RNWAX (46.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWAX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). ACEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.29 vs. RNWAX (26.30). RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.02 vs. ACEMX (-7.34).
| ACEMX | RNWAX | ACEMX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 1.66 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 1.66 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.672 | 6.005 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.6M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.29 | 26.30 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.85 | 38.84 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.34 | 7.02 | -105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.45 | 114.12 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement