Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWAX
ACEMX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWAX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$12.17
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.09M
American Funds New World R1
Price$88.75
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
ACEMX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a StrongBuy and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. ACEMX (19.1M). ACEMX (0.00) and RNWAX (0.00) have matching dividends . ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWAX (37.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWAX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). ACEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.70 vs. RNWAX (18.60). RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.55 vs. ACEMX (-4.25).
| ACEMX | RNWAX | ACEMX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 1.66 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 1.66 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.931 | 20.535 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.1M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.70 | 18.60 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.45 | 40.76 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.25 | 7.55 | -56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.96 | 83.04 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement