ACEHF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 4 closing price
CMEIF
Price
$0.30
Change
+$0.01 (+3.45%)
Updated
Oct 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

ACEHF vs CMEIF

Header iconACEHF vs CMEIF Comparison
Open Charts ACEHF vs CMEIFBanner chart's image
Aspirasi Hidup Indonesia TBK
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
China Meidong Auto
Price$0.30
Change+$0.01 (+3.45%)
Volume$25K
CapitalizationN/A
ACEHF vs CMEIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACEHF vs. CMEIF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEHF is a Hold and CMEIF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (ACEHF: $0.05 vs. CMEIF: $0.30)
Brand notoriety: ACEHF and CMEIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACEHF: 85% vs. CMEIF: 102%
Market capitalization -- ACEHF: $980.4M vs. CMEIF: $1.47B
ACEHF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $980.4M. CMEIF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACEHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCMEIF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ACEHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CMEIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMEIF is a better buy in the long-term than ACEHF.

Price Growth

ACEHF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CMEIF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -5.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-5.55% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMEIF($1.47B) has a higher market cap than ACEHF($980M). CMEIF has higher P/E ratio than ACEHF: CMEIF (20.66) vs ACEHF (15.43). ACEHF YTD gains are higher at: -1.398 vs. CMEIF (-40.000). ACEHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.33T vs. CMEIF (1.62B). ACEHF has more cash in the bank: 2.48T vs. CMEIF (3.5B). CMEIF has less debt than ACEHF: CMEIF (5.54B) vs ACEHF (779B). ACEHF has higher revenues than CMEIF: ACEHF (6.46T) vs CMEIF (24.4B).
ACEHFCMEIFACEHF / CMEIF
Capitalization980M1.47B67%
EBITDA1.33T1.62B81,986%
Gain YTD-1.398-40.0003%
P/E Ratio15.4320.6675%
Revenue6.46T24.4B26,459%
Total Cash2.48T3.5B70,967%
Total Debt779B5.54B14,061%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACEHF: Fundamental Ratings
ACEHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
94
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL248.05-5.43
-2.14%
Apple
SPY586.28-18.01
-2.98%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X100041.540000-6099.062500
-5.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA440.13-39.73
-8.28%
Tesla
GME28.55-2.71
-8.67%
GameStop Corp

ACEHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACEHF and CMEIF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACEHF and CMEIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACEHF
1D Price
Change %
ACEHF100%
N/A
CMEIF - ACEHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AOCIF - ACEHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDNTF - ACEHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWTL - ACEHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYYHF - ACEHF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CMEIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMEIF and CZASF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMEIF and CZASF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMEIF
1D Price
Change %
CMEIF100%
N/A
CZASF - CMEIF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNSO - CMEIF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.44%
ACEHF - CMEIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWMX - CMEIF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
CYYHF - CMEIF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More