Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs TRCLX
ACEAX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs TRCLX
AB All China Equity A
Price$10.76
Change-$0.03 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.04M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$15.01
Change+$0.14 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
ACEAX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. TRCLX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.9M vs. ACEAX (55M). ACEAX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: ACEAX (4.63) vs TRCLX (1.64). ACEAX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: ACEAX (7 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than ACEAX (1.86). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. TRCLX (82.40). ACEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: ACEAX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX (47.20) and ACEAX (46.12) have marching annual gain over last year. TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.24 vs. ACEAX (-14.51).
| ACEAX | TRCLX | ACEAX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.03 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 2.10 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.181 | 5.088 | 102% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 55M | 66.9M | 82% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.63 | 1.64 | 283% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.12 | 47.20 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.41 | 22.07 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.51 | -7.24 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement