Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs TRCLX
ACEAX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs TRCLX
AB All China Equity A
Price$10.54
Change-$0.05 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.31M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.07
Change+$0.06 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.47M
ACEAX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. TRCLX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 62.5M vs. ACEAX (52.3M). ACEAX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: ACEAX (2.13) vs TRCLX (1.36). ACEAX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: ACEAX (7 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than ACEAX (1.86). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. TRCLX (82.40). ACEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: ACEAX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.12 vs. ACEAX (31.96). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.45 vs. ACEAX (-12.64).
| ACEAX | TRCLX | ACEAX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.03 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 2.10 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.421 | 33.239 | 95% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.3M | 62.5M | 84% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 1.36 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.96 | 34.12 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.81 | 24.97 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.64 | -6.45 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |