Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs TRCLX
ACEAX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs TRCLX
AB All China Equity A
Price$10.82
Change-$0.10 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.71M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.63
Change-$0.30 (-2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.84M
ACEAX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. TRCLX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 61.8M vs. ACEAX (54.7M). ACEAX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: ACEAX (2.16) vs TRCLX (1.34). ACEAX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: ACEAX (7 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than ACEAX (1.86). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. TRCLX (82.40). ACEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: ACEAX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). ACEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.01 vs. TRCLX (27.19). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -3.01 vs. ACEAX (-5.64).
| ACEAX | TRCLX | ACEAX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.03 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 2.10 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.913 | 29.072 | 120% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.7M | 61.8M | 89% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 1.34 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.01 | 27.19 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.64 | 32.10 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.64 | -3.01 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement