Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs MCDFX
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs MCDFX
AB All China Equity A
Price$10.82
Change-$0.10 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.71M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.91
Change-$0.10 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. MCDFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. ACEAX (54.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ACEAX: MCDFX (2.78) vs ACEAX (2.16). ACEAX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ACEAX (7 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ACEAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). ACEAX (2500) and MCDFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ACEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.01 vs. MCDFX (27.74). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.89 vs. ACEAX (-5.64).
| ACEAX | MCDFX | ACEAX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.32 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.32 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.913 | 28.884 | 121% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.7M | 104M | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 2.78 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.01 | 27.74 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.64 | 36.75 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.64 | -3.89 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement