Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs MCDFX
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs MCDFX
AB All China Equity A
Price$10.98
Change+$0.08 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.03M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.54
Change-$0.06 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. MCDFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. ACEAX (55M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ACEAX: MCDFX (2.84) vs ACEAX (2.24). ACEAX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ACEAX (7 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ACEAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). ACEAX (2500) and MCDFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.91 vs. ACEAX (33.04). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.29 vs. ACEAX (-7.43).
| ACEAX | MCDFX | ACEAX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.32 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.32 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.910 | 34.849 | 103% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 55M | 99.3M | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 2.84 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.04 | 35.91 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.30 | 36.33 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.43 | -2.29 | 324% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.39 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement