Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs MCDFX
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs MCDFX
AB All China Equity A
Price$10.54
Change-$0.05 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.31M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.08
Change-$0.12 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. MCDFX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 97.7M vs. ACEAX (52.3M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ACEAX: MCDFX (2.83) vs ACEAX (2.13). ACEAX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ACEAX (7 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ACEAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). ACEAX (2500) and MCDFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ACEAX (31.96) and MCDFX (31.60) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -6.94 vs. ACEAX (-12.64).
| ACEAX | MCDFX | ACEAX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.32 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.32 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.421 | 30.354 | 104% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.3M | 97.7M | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 2.83 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.96 | 31.60 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.81 | 20.42 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.64 | -6.94 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 37.07 | - |