Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs MCDFX
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs MCDFX
AB All China Equity A
Price$10.26
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.75M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. MCDFX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 97.7M vs. ACEAX (52.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ACEAX: MCDFX (2.83) vs ACEAX (2.13). ACEAX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ACEAX (7 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ACEAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). ACEAX (2500) and MCDFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCDFX (26.20) and ACEAX (25.74) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.82 vs. ACEAX (-13.61).
| ACEAX | MCDFX | ACEAX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.32 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.32 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.930 | 27.587 | 101% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.7M | 97.7M | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 2.83 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.74 | 26.20 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.52 | 18.26 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.61 | -8.82 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement