Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs MCDFX
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs MCDFX
AB All China Equity A
Price$10.76
Change-$0.03 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.04M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.21
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.9M
ACEAX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 92.9M vs. ACEAX (55M). ACEAX pays higher dividends than MCDFX: ACEAX (4.63) vs MCDFX (4.05). ACEAX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ACEAX (7 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ACEAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MCDFX (75.80). ACEAX (2500) and MCDFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ACEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.12 vs. MCDFX (39.81). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -9.97 vs. ACEAX (-14.51).
| ACEAX | MCDFX | ACEAX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.32 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.32 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.181 | 3.823 | 136% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 55M | 92.9M | 59% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.63 | 4.05 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.12 | 39.81 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.41 | 10.28 | 305% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.51 | -9.97 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement