Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs FHKCX
ACEAX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs FHKCX
AB All China Equity A
Price$10.59
Change-$0.70 (-6.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.41M
Fidelity China Region
Price$60.43
Change+$4.08 (+7.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
ACEAX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. FHKCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Hold and FHKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. ACEAX (53.4M). ACEAX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: ACEAX (4.38) vs FHKCX (1.58). ACEAX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: ACEAX (8 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). ACEAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FHKCX (34.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEAX: FHKCX (0) vs ACEAX (2500). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.96 vs. ACEAX (35.88). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.14 vs. ACEAX (-19.63).
| ACEAX | FHKCX | ACEAX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.91 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.91 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.519 | 10.921 | 32% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.4M | 2.07B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.38 | 1.58 | 277% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.88 | 56.96 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.28 | 72.17 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.63 | 2.14 | -918% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 208.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement