Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs FHKAX
ACEAX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs FHKAX
AB All China Equity A
Price$10.82
Change-$0.10 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.71M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$53.89
Change-$0.31 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
ACEAX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. FHKAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Hold and FHKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. ACEAX (54.7M). ACEAX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: ACEAX (2.16) vs FHKAX (0.86). ACEAX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: ACEAX (7 years) vs FHKAX (17 years). ACEAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX initial investment is less costly to investors than ACEAX (4%) vs ACEAX (4%). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEAX: FHKAX (0) vs ACEAX (2500). FHKAX (34.06) and ACEAX (33.01) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.88 vs. ACEAX (-5.64).
| ACEAX | FHKAX | ACEAX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.18 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.18 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.913 | 40.485 | 86% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.7M | 1.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 0.86 | 250% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.01 | 34.06 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.64 | 101.45 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.64 | 8.88 | -63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 88.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement