Advertisement
ACDSF vs DHC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACDSF is a Hold and DHC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACDSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ACDSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- DHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACDSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DHC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACDSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
- DHC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
ACDSF (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а -2.54% price change this week, while DHC (@Managed Health Care) price change was +0.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.95%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.56%.
Reported Earning Dates
DHC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (+0.31% weekly)Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.
@Managed Health Care (+0.35% weekly)Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
| ACDSF | DHC | ACDSF / DHC | |
| Capitalization | 9.68B | 814M | 1,189% |
| EBITDA | 1.01B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.483 | 48.287 | 36% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.91 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.52B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 168M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 7.16B | 2.8B | 256% |
ACDSF | DHC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DHC's Valuation (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACDSF (91). This means that DHC’s stock grew significantly faster than ACDSF’s over the last 12 months.
DHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ACDSF (100). This means that DHC’s stock grew similarly to ACDSF’s over the last 12 months.
DHC's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as ACDSF (96). This means that DHC’s stock grew similarly to ACDSF’s over the last 12 months.
ACDSF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as DHC (53). This means that ACDSF’s stock grew similarly to DHC’s over the last 12 months.
ACDSF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DHC (100). This means that ACDSF’s stock grew similarly to DHC’s over the last 12 months.
| ACDSF | DHC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 46% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
ACDSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACDSF and DHC have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACDSF and DHC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACDSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACDSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| DHC - ACDSF | 13% Poorly correlated | -3.16% | ||
| PINE - ACDSF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
| NTST - ACDSF | -3% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
| AEDFF - ACDSF | -4% Poorly correlated | N/A |
DHC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DHC has been loosely correlated with PLYM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DHC jumps, then PLYM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DHC | 100% | -3.16% | ||
| PLYM - DHC | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| SRRTF - DHC | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| AKR - DHC | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| EPR - DHC | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| LXP - DHC | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||