Advertisement
ACDSF vs AEDFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACDSF is a Hold and AEDFF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACDSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileAEDFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ACDSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- AEDFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACDSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ACDSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ACDSF (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а -13.24% price change this week, while AEDFF (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.27%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was -0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.41%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (-0.40% weekly)Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.
@Publishing: Books/Magazines (-0.77% weekly)The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
| ACDSF | AEDFF | ACDSF / AEDFF | |
| Capitalization | 10B | 3.71B | 269% |
| EBITDA | 990M | 351M | 282% |
| Gain YTD | 0.668 | 28.837 | 2% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.55 | 17.33 | 84% |
| Revenue | 1.51B | 368M | 410% |
| Total Cash | 181M | 20.5M | 883% |
| Total Debt | 7.16B | 2.5B | 286% |
ACDSF | AEDFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AEDFF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACDSF (94). This means that AEDFF’s stock grew significantly faster than ACDSF’s over the last 12 months.
AEDFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ACDSF (100). This means that AEDFF’s stock grew similarly to ACDSF’s over the last 12 months.
AEDFF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as ACDSF (96). This means that AEDFF’s stock grew similarly to ACDSF’s over the last 12 months.
AEDFF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as ACDSF (64). This means that AEDFF’s stock grew similarly to ACDSF’s over the last 12 months.
AEDFF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as ACDSF (99). This means that AEDFF’s stock grew similarly to ACDSF’s over the last 12 months.
| ACDSF | AEDFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 22% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 23% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ANFCX | 57.15 | 0.25 | +0.44% |
| American Funds New Economy C | |||
| HIADX | 23.12 | 0.08 | +0.35% |
| Hartford Dividend and Growth HLS IA | |||
| TGWTX | 12.14 | 0.01 | +0.08% |
| Transamerica Large Growth I3 | |||
| DIERX | 48.43 | -0.05 | -0.10% |
| BNY Mellon International Core Equity I | |||
| NIQTX | 14.28 | -0.02 | -0.14% |
| Neuberger International Eq Trst | |||
ACDSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACDSF and DHC have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACDSF and DHC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACDSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACDSF | 100% | -15.99% | ||
| DHC - ACDSF | 16% Poorly correlated | -2.40% | ||
| PINE - ACDSF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
| NTST - ACDSF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| AEDFF - ACDSF | -7% Poorly correlated | N/A |
AEDFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEDFF has been loosely correlated with ARLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AEDFF jumps, then ARLLF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEDFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEDFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ARLLF - AEDFF | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CCPPF - AEDFF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DHC - AEDFF | 1% Poorly correlated | -2.40% | ||
| NTST - AEDFF | -4% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| PINE - AEDFF | -5% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
More | ||||