ACDSF
Price
$1.88
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
10.02B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
AEDFF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
3.67B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACDSF vs AEDFF

Header iconACDSF vs AEDFF Comparison
Open Charts ACDSF vs AEDFFBanner chart's image
Ascendas Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$1.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$380
Capitalization10.02B
Aedifica Sicafi, Bruxelles
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.67B
ACDSF vs AEDFF Comparison Chart in %
ACDSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACDSF vs. AEDFF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACDSF is a Hold and AEDFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (ACDSF: $1.88 vs. AEDFF: $74.50)
Brand notoriety: ACDSF and AEDFF are both not notable
ACDSF represents the Miscellaneous Manufacturing, while AEDFF is part of the Managed Health Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACDSF: 13% vs. AEDFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ACDSF: $10.02B vs. AEDFF: $3.67B
ACDSF [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] is valued at $10.02B. AEDFF’s [@Managed Health Care] market capitalization is $3.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry ranges from $115.18B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $131.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry is $8.55B. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $9.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACDSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileAEDFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACDSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • AEDFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AEDFF is a better buy in the long-term than ACDSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACDSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ACDSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

ACDSF (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а -13.51% price change this week, while AEDFF (@Managed Health Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was -1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.78%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (-1.47% weekly)

Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.

@Managed Health Care (+1.55% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACDSF($10B) has a higher market cap than AEDFF($3.67B). AEDFF has higher P/E ratio than ACDSF: AEDFF (17.33) vs ACDSF (15.34). AEDFF YTD gains are higher at: 28.837 vs. ACDSF (4.788). ACDSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 990M vs. AEDFF (292M). ACDSF has more cash in the bank: 181M vs. AEDFF (61.8M). AEDFF has less debt than ACDSF: AEDFF (2.58B) vs ACDSF (7.16B). ACDSF has higher revenues than AEDFF: ACDSF (1.51B) vs AEDFF (363M).
ACDSFAEDFFACDSF / AEDFF
Capitalization10B3.67B273%
EBITDA990M292M339%
Gain YTD4.78828.83717%
P/E Ratio15.3417.3388%
Revenue1.51B363M415%
Total Cash181M61.8M293%
Total Debt7.16B2.58B277%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACDSF: Fundamental Ratings
ACDSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
70
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACDSFAEDFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
45%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
53%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACDSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RAIIX28.790.24
+0.84%
Manning & Napier Rainier Intl Discv I
HISIX11.440.08
+0.70%
Homestead International Equity
LVOSX19.020.11
+0.58%
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities R4
PRUAX17.210.02
+0.12%
PGIM Jennison Utility A
MFECX137.73-0.31
-0.22%
MFS Growth C

ACDSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACDSF and DHC have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACDSF and DHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACDSF
1D Price
Change %
ACDSF100%
+0.21%
DHC - ACDSF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PINE - ACDSF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
NTST - ACDSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
AEDFF - ACDSF
-7%
Poorly correlated
N/A

AEDFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEDFF has been loosely correlated with ARLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AEDFF jumps, then ARLLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AEDFF
1D Price
Change %
AEDFF100%
N/A
ARLLF - AEDFF
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CCPPF - AEDFF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DHC - AEDFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTST - AEDFF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
PINE - AEDFF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
More