ACDC
Price
$3.69
Change
-$0.13 (-3.40%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
690.02M
131 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PSYTF
Price
$8.90
Change
+$0.26 (+3.01%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
689.11M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACDC vs PSYTF

Header iconACDC vs PSYTF Comparison
Open Charts ACDC vs PSYTFBanner chart's image
ProFrac Holding
Price$3.69
Change-$0.13 (-3.40%)
Volume$84.79K
Capitalization690.02M
Pason Systems
Price$8.90
Change+$0.26 (+3.01%)
Volume$22.2K
Capitalization689.11M
ACDC vs PSYTF Comparison Chart in %
ACDC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PSYTF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACDC vs. PSYTF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACDC is a Hold and PSYTF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (ACDC: $3.82 vs. PSYTF: $8.90)
Brand notoriety: ACDC and PSYTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACDC: 109% vs. PSYTF: 83%
Market capitalization -- ACDC: $668.32M vs. PSYTF: $662.7M
ACDC [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $668.32M. PSYTF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $662.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $54.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACDC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePSYTF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ACDC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PSYTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSYTF is a better buy in the long-term than ACDC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACDC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSYTF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACDC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PSYTF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PSYTF is a better buy in the short-term than ACDC.

Price Growth

ACDC (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -27.61% price change this week, while PSYTF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +5.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACDC is expected to report earnings on Mar 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.33% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACDC($690M) and PSYTF($689M) have the same market capitalization . PSYTF YTD gains are higher at: -5.077 vs. ACDC (-50.838). ACDC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 344M vs. PSYTF (154M). PSYTF has more cash in the bank: 69.3M vs. ACDC (26M). PSYTF has less debt than ACDC: PSYTF (15.1M) vs ACDC (1.23B). ACDC has higher revenues than PSYTF: ACDC (2.13B) vs PSYTF (423M).
ACDCPSYTFACDC / PSYTF
Capitalization690M689M100%
EBITDA344M154M223%
Gain YTD-50.838-5.0771,001%
P/E RatioN/A16.00-
Revenue2.13B423M504%
Total Cash26M69.3M38%
Total Debt1.23B15.1M8,132%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PSYTF: Fundamental Ratings
PSYTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
32
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACDCPSYTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACDC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PSYTF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HWSIX74.040.43
+0.58%
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value I
TFSCX17.310.07
+0.41%
Templeton Ins Foreign Smaller Co Ser Adv
SILVX18.850.04
+0.21%
SGI US Large Cap Equity I
TSMNX16.960.02
+0.12%
Nuveen Quant Small/Mid Cap Eq I
FIIIX23.39N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor International Growth I

ACDC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACDC has been loosely correlated with PUMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACDC jumps, then PUMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACDC
1D Price
Change %
ACDC100%
-10.24%
PUMP - ACDC
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.98%
AESI - ACDC
54%
Loosely correlated
-16.21%
RES - ACDC
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.17%
TTI - ACDC
52%
Loosely correlated
-7.65%
LBRT - ACDC
52%
Loosely correlated
-6.75%
More

PSYTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSYTF and NINE have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSYTF and NINE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSYTF
1D Price
Change %
PSYTF100%
+3.01%
NINE - PSYTF
23%
Poorly correlated
-8.09%
PUMP - PSYTF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
CLB - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.40%
ACDC - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-10.24%
XPRO - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
More