ACCMF
Price
$8.14
Change
+$0.32 (+4.09%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
51.01M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MNTS
Price
$0.77
Change
-$0.05 (-6.10%)
Updated
Nov 14, 04:43 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.66M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACCMF vs MNTS

Header iconACCMF vs MNTS Comparison
Open Charts ACCMF vs MNTSBanner chart's image
AAC CLYDE SPACE AB
Price$8.14
Change+$0.32 (+4.09%)
Volume$122
Capitalization51.01M
Momentus
Price$0.77
Change-$0.05 (-6.10%)
Volume$1.22K
Capitalization18.66M
ACCMF vs MNTS Comparison Chart in %
ACCMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACCMF vs. MNTS commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACCMF is a StrongBuy and MNTS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (ACCMF: $8.14 vs. MNTS: $0.82)
Brand notoriety: ACCMF and MNTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Aerospace & Defense industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACCMF: 6% vs. MNTS: 19%
Market capitalization -- ACCMF: $51.01M vs. MNTS: $18.66M
ACCMF [@Aerospace & Defense] is valued at $51.01M. MNTS’s [@Aerospace & Defense] market capitalization is $18.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry ranges from $320.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry is $22.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACCMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ACCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MNTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACCMF is a better buy in the long-term than MNTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACCMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNTS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACCMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MNTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACCMF is a better buy in the short-term than MNTS.

Price Growth

ACCMF (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +4.09% price change this week, while MNTS (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -15.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was -2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (-2.21% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACCMF($51M) has a higher market cap than MNTS($18.7M). ACCMF YTD gains are higher at: 93.810 vs. MNTS (-89.696). ACCMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 65.6M vs. MNTS (-29.72M). ACCMF has more cash in the bank: 28M vs. MNTS (132K). MNTS has less debt than ACCMF: MNTS (5.28M) vs ACCMF (69.3M). ACCMF has higher revenues than MNTS: ACCMF (376M) vs MNTS (905K).
ACCMFMNTSACCMF / MNTS
Capitalization51M18.7M273%
EBITDA65.6M-29.72M-221%
Gain YTD93.810-89.696-105%
P/E RatioN/A0.03-
Revenue376M905K41,547%
Total Cash28M132K21,212%
Total Debt69.3M5.28M1,314%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACCMF vs MNTS: Fundamental Ratings
ACCMF
MNTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
91100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6496
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10099
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
27n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACCMF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is in the same range as MNTS (44). This means that ACCMF’s stock grew similarly to MNTS’s over the last 12 months.

ACCMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MNTS (100). This means that ACCMF’s stock grew similarly to MNTS’s over the last 12 months.

ACCMF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as MNTS (100). This means that ACCMF’s stock grew similarly to MNTS’s over the last 12 months.

ACCMF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as MNTS (96). This means that ACCMF’s stock grew similarly to MNTS’s over the last 12 months.

MNTS's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as ACCMF (100). This means that MNTS’s stock grew similarly to ACCMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACCMFMNTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACCMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SVRA4.260.14
+3.40%
Savara
CCEP91.65-1.65
-1.77%
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
SLAB123.70-3.25
-2.56%
Silicon Laboratories
LSTA2.07-0.09
-4.17%
Lisata Therapeutics
GAMB5.25-1.58
-23.13%
Gambling.com Group Limited

ACCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACCMF and AKRRF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACCMF and AKRRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACCMF
1D Price
Change %
ACCMF100%
+4.09%
AKRRF - ACCMF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AERG - ACCMF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
MNTS - ACCMF
4%
Poorly correlated
-7.41%
HWM - ACCMF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
ATROB - ACCMF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More