ACCFF
Price
$2.42
Change
-$0.17 (-6.59%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
42.17M
LPRO
Price
$2.25
Change
+$0.02 (+0.90%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
744.17M
36 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACCFF vs LPRO

Header iconACCFF vs LPRO Comparison
Open Charts ACCFF vs LPROBanner chart's image
Accord Financial
Price$2.42
Change-$0.17 (-6.59%)
Volume$1.25K
Capitalization42.17M
Open Lending
Price$2.25
Change+$0.02 (+0.90%)
Volume$575.7K
Capitalization744.17M
ACCFF vs LPRO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LPRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACCFF vs. LPRO commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACCFF is a Hold and LPRO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ACCFF: $2.41 vs. LPRO: $2.25)
Brand notoriety: ACCFF and LPRO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACCFF: 131% vs. LPRO: 39%
Market capitalization -- ACCFF: $42.17M vs. LPRO: $744.17M
ACCFF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $42.17M. LPRO’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $744.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACCFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLPRO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACCFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LPRO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ACCFF and LPRO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACCFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LPRO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACCFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • LPRO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACCFF is a better buy in the short-term than LPRO.

Price Growth

ACCFF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LPRO (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +12.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

LPRO is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+2.35% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LPRO($744M) has a higher market cap than ACCFF($42.2M). ACCFF has higher P/E ratio than LPRO: ACCFF (161.29) vs LPRO (33.11). ACCFF YTD gains are higher at: -10.223 vs. LPRO (-62.312). LPRO has more cash in the bank: 240M vs. ACCFF (2.38M). LPRO has less debt than ACCFF: LPRO (148M) vs ACCFF (370M). LPRO has higher revenues than ACCFF: LPRO (117M) vs ACCFF (42.7M).
ACCFFLPROACCFF / LPRO
Capitalization42.2M744M6%
EBITDAN/A40.7M-
Gain YTD-10.223-62.31216%
P/E Ratio161.2933.11487%
Revenue42.7M117M36%
Total Cash2.38M240M1%
Total Debt370M148M250%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACCFF vs LPRO: Fundamental Ratings
ACCFF
LPRO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7841
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
19
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACCFF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LPRO (94). This means that ACCFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LPRO’s over the last 12 months.

ACCFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LPRO (100). This means that ACCFF’s stock grew similarly to LPRO’s over the last 12 months.

ACCFF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as LPRO (98). This means that ACCFF’s stock grew similarly to LPRO’s over the last 12 months.

LPRO's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACCFF (78). This means that LPRO’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACCFF’s over the last 12 months.

ACCFF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as LPRO (9). This means that ACCFF’s stock grew similarly to LPRO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACCFFLPRO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LPRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NJDCY4.770.01
+0.32%
Nidec Corp.
DTNOF1.26N/A
N/A
DNO ASA
TRNLY1.25N/A
N/A
The Trendlines Group Ltd.
TORM1.20N/A
N/A
TOR Minerals International, Inc.
KOSCF45.01N/A
N/A
Kose Corp.

ACCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACCFF and LPRO have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACCFF and LPRO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACCFF
1D Price
Change %
ACCFF100%
N/A
LPRO - ACCFF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
FOA - ACCFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALTG - ACCFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.67%
FINV - ACCFF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.47%
UWMC - ACCFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LPRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LPRO has been loosely correlated with LC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LPRO jumps, then LC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LPRO
1D Price
Change %
LPRO100%
+0.90%
LC - LPRO
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
ENVA - LPRO
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
SNFCA - LPRO
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
PRAA - LPRO
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
WD - LPRO
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
More