ACCFF
Price
$2.42
Change
-$0.17 (-6.59%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
21.78M
LPRO
Price
$2.06
Change
-$0.01 (-0.48%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
243.44M
85 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACCFF vs LPRO

Header iconACCFF vs LPRO Comparison
Open Charts ACCFF vs LPROBanner chart's image
Accord Financial
Price$2.42
Change-$0.17 (-6.59%)
Volume$1.25K
Capitalization21.78M
Open Lending
Price$2.06
Change-$0.01 (-0.48%)
Volume$426.81K
Capitalization243.44M
ACCFF vs LPRO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LPRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACCFF vs. LPRO commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACCFF is a Hold and LPRO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ACCFF: $2.41 vs. LPRO: $2.06)
Brand notoriety: ACCFF and LPRO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACCFF: 100% vs. LPRO: 44%
Market capitalization -- ACCFF: $21.78M vs. LPRO: $243.44M
ACCFF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $21.78M. LPRO’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $243.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $668.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACCFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLPRO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACCFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LPRO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ACCFF and LPRO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACCFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LPRO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACCFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • LPRO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACCFF is a better buy in the short-term than LPRO.

Price Growth

ACCFF (@Savings Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LPRO (@Savings Banks) price change was -7.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +2.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

LPRO is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+2.73% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LPRO($243M) has a higher market cap than ACCFF($21.8M). ACCFF YTD gains are higher at: -10.223 vs. LPRO (-65.494). LPRO has less debt than ACCFF: LPRO (198M) vs ACCFF (338M). ACCFF has higher revenues than LPRO: ACCFF (44.4M) vs LPRO (17.7M).
ACCFFLPROACCFF / LPRO
Capitalization21.8M243M9%
EBITDAN/A-58.47M-
Gain YTD-10.223-65.49416%
P/E RatioN/A69.00-
Revenue44.4M17.7M251%
Total CashN/A236M-
Total Debt338M198M171%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACCFF vs LPRO: Fundamental Ratings
ACCFF
LPRO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9298
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7690
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
19
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LPRO's Valuation (95) in the null industry is in the same range as ACCFF (98). This means that LPRO’s stock grew similarly to ACCFF’s over the last 12 months.

LPRO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ACCFF (100). This means that LPRO’s stock grew similarly to ACCFF’s over the last 12 months.

ACCFF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as LPRO (98). This means that ACCFF’s stock grew similarly to LPRO’s over the last 12 months.

ACCFF's Price Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as LPRO (90). This means that ACCFF’s stock grew similarly to LPRO’s over the last 12 months.

ACCFF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as LPRO (9). This means that ACCFF’s stock grew similarly to LPRO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACCFFLPRO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LPRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AWAEF0.08N/A
N/A
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
SMSOF1.58N/A
N/A
SAMSONITE GROUP S A
SFCO9.55N/A
N/A
Southern Financial Corp.
MREYF0.04N/A
N/A
PURANIUM ENERGY LTD.
AKRBY11.90-0.11
-0.92%
Aker BP Asa

ACCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACCFF and LPRO have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACCFF and LPRO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACCFF
1D Price
Change %
ACCFF100%
N/A
LPRO - ACCFF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
FOA - ACCFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
ALTG - ACCFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.41%
FINV - ACCFF
2%
Poorly correlated
+5.78%
OPRT - ACCFF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
More

LPRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LPRO has been loosely correlated with LC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LPRO jumps, then LC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LPRO
1D Price
Change %
LPRO100%
-0.48%
LC - LPRO
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
ENVA - LPRO
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.82%
PRAA - LPRO
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.88%
MFIN - LPRO
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
WRLD - LPRO
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
More