ACCFF
Price
$2.42
Change
-$0.17 (-6.59%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
21.78M
FINV
Price
$9.33
Change
+$0.51 (+5.78%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.36B
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACCFF vs FINV

Header iconACCFF vs FINV Comparison
Open Charts ACCFF vs FINVBanner chart's image
Accord Financial
Price$2.42
Change-$0.17 (-6.59%)
Volume$1.25K
Capitalization21.78M
FinVolution Group
Price$9.33
Change+$0.51 (+5.78%)
Volume$1.73M
Capitalization2.36B
ACCFF vs FINV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FINV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACCFF vs. FINV commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACCFF is a Hold and FINV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ACCFF: $2.41 vs. FINV: $9.33)
Brand notoriety: ACCFF and FINV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACCFF: 100% vs. FINV: 93%
Market capitalization -- ACCFF: $21.78M vs. FINV: $2.36B
ACCFF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $21.78M. FINV’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $2.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $668.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACCFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFINV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ACCFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FINV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FINV is a better buy in the long-term than ACCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACCFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FINV’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACCFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • FINV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FINV is a better buy in the short-term than ACCFF.

Price Growth

ACCFF (@Savings Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FINV (@Savings Banks) price change was +1.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +2.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

FINV is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+2.73% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FINV($2.36B) has a higher market cap than ACCFF($21.8M). FINV YTD gains are higher at: 42.598 vs. ACCFF (-10.223). FINV has less debt than ACCFF: FINV (59M) vs ACCFF (338M). FINV has higher revenues than ACCFF: FINV (13.4B) vs ACCFF (44.4M).
ACCFFFINVACCFF / FINV
Capitalization21.8M2.36B1%
EBITDAN/A2.79B-
Gain YTD-10.22342.598-24%
P/E RatioN/A6.73-
Revenue44.4M13.4B0%
Total CashN/A8.46B-
Total Debt338M59M573%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACCFF vs FINV: Fundamental Ratings
ACCFF
FINV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10034
SMR RATING
1..100
9250
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
122
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FINV's Valuation (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACCFF (98). This means that FINV’s stock grew significantly faster than ACCFF’s over the last 12 months.

FINV's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACCFF (100). This means that FINV’s stock grew significantly faster than ACCFF’s over the last 12 months.

FINV's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACCFF (92). This means that FINV’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACCFF’s over the last 12 months.

FINV's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as ACCFF (76). This means that FINV’s stock grew similarly to ACCFF’s over the last 12 months.

ACCFF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as FINV (22). This means that ACCFF’s stock grew similarly to FINV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACCFFFINV
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FINV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AWAEF0.08N/A
N/A
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
SMSOF1.58N/A
N/A
SAMSONITE GROUP S A
SFCO9.55N/A
N/A
Southern Financial Corp.
MREYF0.04N/A
N/A
PURANIUM ENERGY LTD.
AKRBY11.90-0.11
-0.92%
Aker BP Asa

ACCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACCFF and LPRO have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACCFF and LPRO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACCFF
1D Price
Change %
ACCFF100%
N/A
LPRO - ACCFF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
FOA - ACCFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
ALTG - ACCFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.41%
FINV - ACCFF
2%
Poorly correlated
+5.78%
OPRT - ACCFF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
More

FINV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FINV has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FINV jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FINV
1D Price
Change %
FINV100%
+5.78%
QFIN - FINV
63%
Loosely correlated
-4.05%
LX - FINV
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
YRD - FINV
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
LU - FINV
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.40%
XYF - FINV
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.65%
More