ACB
Price
$4.54
Change
-$0.04 (-0.88%)
Updated
Dec 26, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
259.17M
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SHIEF
Price
$0.13
Change
+$0.04 (+44.44%)
Updated
Dec 22 closing price
Capitalization
156.39M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACB vs SHIEF

Header iconACB vs SHIEF Comparison
Open Charts ACB vs SHIEFBanner chart's image
Aurora Cannabis
Price$4.54
Change-$0.04 (-0.88%)
Volume$304
Capitalization259.17M
Shield Therapeutics
Price$0.13
Change+$0.04 (+44.44%)
Volume$440
Capitalization156.39M
ACB vs SHIEF Comparison Chart in %
ACB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SHIEF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACB vs. SHIEF commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACB is a Buy and SHIEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ACB: $4.57 vs. SHIEF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: ACB: Notable vs. SHIEF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACB: 55% vs. SHIEF: 16%
Market capitalization -- ACB: $259.17M vs. SHIEF: $156.39M
ACB [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $259.17M. SHIEF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $156.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $63.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHIEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ACB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHIEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHIEF is a better buy in the long-term than ACB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHIEF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SHIEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHIEF is a better buy in the short-term than ACB.

Price Growth

ACB (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а -17.95% price change this week, while SHIEF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was +49.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACB is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-1.58% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACB($259M) has a higher market cap than SHIEF($156M). SHIEF YTD gains are higher at: 289.855 vs. ACB (7.529). SHIEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -12.92M vs. ACB (-19.87M). ACB has more cash in the bank: 95.7M vs. SHIEF (10.8M). SHIEF has less debt than ACB: SHIEF (27M) vs ACB (100M). ACB has higher revenues than SHIEF: ACB (367M) vs SHIEF (41.5M).
ACBSHIEFACB / SHIEF
Capitalization259M156M166%
EBITDA-19.87M-12.92M154%
Gain YTD7.529289.8553%
P/E Ratio19.44N/A-
Revenue367M41.5M884%
Total Cash95.7M10.8M886%
Total Debt100M27M370%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACB vs SHIEF: Fundamental Ratings
ACB
SHIEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9598
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5334
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9093
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACB's Valuation (58) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as SHIEF (86) in the null industry. This means that ACB’s stock grew similarly to SHIEF’s over the last 12 months.

ACB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as SHIEF (100) in the null industry. This means that ACB’s stock grew similarly to SHIEF’s over the last 12 months.

ACB's SMR Rating (95) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as SHIEF (98) in the null industry. This means that ACB’s stock grew similarly to SHIEF’s over the last 12 months.

SHIEF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as ACB (53) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that SHIEF’s stock grew similarly to ACB’s over the last 12 months.

ACB's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as SHIEF (93) in the null industry. This means that ACB’s stock grew similarly to SHIEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACBSHIEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SHIEF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNEFF3.130.02
+0.71%
Bonterra Energy Corp.
DKDRF5.67N/A
N/A
NEWMED ENERGY LTD.
JPSTF13.54N/A
N/A
JAPAN POST BK CO LTD
SMTGY3.77N/A
N/A
SMA Solar Technology Ag
TRPTF0.22N/A
N/A
Tribe Property Technologies Inc.

ACB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACB has been closely correlated with CGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACB jumps, then CGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACB
1D Price
Change %
ACB100%
-1.72%
CGC - ACB
67%
Closely correlated
-6.43%
SNDL - ACB
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
OGI - ACB
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
TLRY - ACB
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.61%
CRON - ACB
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
More

SHIEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHIEF and TLRY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHIEF and TLRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHIEF
1D Price
Change %
SHIEF100%
N/A
TLRY - SHIEF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.61%
CGC - SHIEF
26%
Poorly correlated
-6.43%
ACB - SHIEF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
IMCC - SHIEF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
CVSI - SHIEF
20%
Poorly correlated
+17.83%
More