ACA
Price
$97.64
Change
-$0.61 (-0.62%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.79B
53 days until earnings call
PNOCF
Price
$5.60
Change
-$0.41 (-6.82%)
Updated
Oct 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.99B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACA vs PNOCF

Header iconACA vs PNOCF Comparison
Open Charts ACA vs PNOCFBanner chart's image
Arcosa
Price$97.64
Change-$0.61 (-0.62%)
Volume$183.9K
Capitalization4.79B
Penta Ocean Construction
Price$5.60
Change-$0.41 (-6.82%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.99B
ACA vs PNOCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACA vs. PNOCF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACA is a Hold and PNOCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ACA: $97.64 vs. PNOCF: $5.60)
Brand notoriety: ACA and PNOCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACA: 65% vs. PNOCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ACA: $4.79B vs. PNOCF: $1.99B
ACA [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $4.79B. PNOCF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $1.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePNOCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PNOCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACA is a better buy in the long-term than PNOCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ACA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

ACA (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -1.32% price change this week, while PNOCF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +201.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACA is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-0.30% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACA($4.79B) has a higher market cap than PNOCF($1.99B). ACA (52.21) and PNOCF (49.85) have similar P/E ratio . ACA YTD gains are higher at: 1.104 vs. PNOCF (0.000). PNOCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.8B vs. ACA (452M). PNOCF has more cash in the bank: 54.2B vs. ACA (190M). ACA has less debt than PNOCF: ACA (1.68B) vs PNOCF (170B). PNOCF has higher revenues than ACA: PNOCF (667B) vs ACA (2.68B).
ACAPNOCFACA / PNOCF
Capitalization4.79B1.99B240%
EBITDA452M39.8B1%
Gain YTD1.1040.000-
P/E Ratio52.2149.85105%
Revenue2.68B667B0%
Total Cash190M54.2B0%
Total Debt1.68B170B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACA vs PNOCF: Fundamental Ratings
ACA
PNOCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6736
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
361
SMR RATING
1..100
87100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4471
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PNOCF's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as ACA (89) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that PNOCF’s stock grew similarly to ACA’s over the last 12 months.

PNOCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACA (36) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that PNOCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACA’s over the last 12 months.

ACA's SMR Rating (87) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as PNOCF (100) in the null industry. This means that ACA’s stock grew similarly to PNOCF’s over the last 12 months.

ACA's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as PNOCF (71) in the null industry. This means that ACA’s stock grew similarly to PNOCF’s over the last 12 months.

ACA's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for PNOCF (100) in the null industry. This means that ACA’s stock grew significantly faster than PNOCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRGIX117.441.18
+1.01%
Bridges Investment Fund
TEGRX30.040.21
+0.70%
Templeton Growth R
RLSFX14.850.09
+0.61%
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
MLPFX8.950.04
+0.41%
Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 A
PCIEX19.890.07
+0.35%
PACE International Equity P

ACA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACA has been loosely correlated with GVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACA jumps, then GVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACA
1D Price
Change %
ACA100%
-0.62%
GVA - ACA
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
ACM - ACA
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
ROAD - ACA
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
MTRX - ACA
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
MTZ - ACA
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.47%
More

PNOCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNOCF has been loosely correlated with KBR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PNOCF jumps, then KBR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNOCF
1D Price
Change %
PNOCF100%
N/A
KBR - PNOCF
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.16%
MTZ - PNOCF
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
MLLUY - PNOCF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACA - PNOCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
SKSBF - PNOCF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More