ACA
Price
$120.76
Change
+$1.77 (+1.49%)
Updated
Feb 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.84B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MTZ
Price
$245.10
Change
+$9.66 (+4.10%)
Updated
Feb 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.58B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACA vs MTZ

Header iconACA vs MTZ Comparison
Open Charts ACA vs MTZBanner chart's image
Arcosa
Price$120.76
Change+$1.77 (+1.49%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization5.84B
MasTec
Price$245.10
Change+$9.66 (+4.10%)
Volume$4.62K
Capitalization18.58B
ACA vs MTZ Comparison Chart in %
ACA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MTZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACA vs. MTZ commentary
Feb 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACA is a Hold and MTZ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 06, 2026
Stock price -- (ACA: $118.99 vs. MTZ: $235.44)
Brand notoriety: ACA: Not notable vs. MTZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACA: 69% vs. MTZ: 151%
Market capitalization -- ACA: $5.84B vs. MTZ: $18.58B
ACA [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $5.84B. MTZ’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $18.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $9.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ACA and MTZ are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTZ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACA is a better buy in the short-term than MTZ.

Price Growth

ACA (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +5.25% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -3.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACA is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

MTZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.02% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTZ($18.6B) has a higher market cap than ACA($5.84B). MTZ has higher P/E ratio than ACA: MTZ (56.06) vs ACA (39.40). ACA YTD gains are higher at: 11.967 vs. MTZ (8.313). MTZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.04B vs. ACA (542M). ACA has less debt than MTZ: ACA (1.58B) vs MTZ (2.77B). MTZ has higher revenues than ACA: MTZ (13.8B) vs ACA (2.83B).
ACAMTZACA / MTZ
Capitalization5.84B18.6B31%
EBITDA542M1.04B52%
Gain YTD11.9678.313144%
P/E Ratio39.4056.0670%
Revenue2.83B13.8B21%
Total CashN/A231M-
Total Debt1.58B2.77B57%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACA vs MTZ: Fundamental Ratings
ACA
MTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1211
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3623
SMR RATING
1..100
8366
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5196
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACA's Valuation (79) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as MTZ (87) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that ACA’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

MTZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as ACA (36) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to ACA’s over the last 12 months.

MTZ's SMR Rating (66) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as ACA (83) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to ACA’s over the last 12 months.

MTZ's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as ACA (44) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to ACA’s over the last 12 months.

ACA's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTZ (96) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that ACA’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACAMTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MTZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EUDG39.390.18
+0.46%
WisdomTree Europe Quality Div Gr ETF
FSMD46.250.20
+0.43%
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
RFMZ13.140.03
+0.23%
RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund II
SATO16.25-0.95
-5.55%
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Eco ETF
HOOG26.09-4.75
-15.40%
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF

ACA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACA has been loosely correlated with GVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACA jumps, then GVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACA
1D Price
Change %
ACA100%
+0.95%
GVA - ACA
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
MYRG - ACA
64%
Loosely correlated
-5.77%
DY - ACA
62%
Loosely correlated
-7.28%
ALG - ACA
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.94%
MTZ - ACA
61%
Loosely correlated
-5.64%
More

MTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with EME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then EME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTZ
1D Price
Change %
MTZ100%
-5.64%
EME - MTZ
84%
Closely correlated
-4.82%
PWR - MTZ
82%
Closely correlated
-4.92%
PRIM - MTZ
78%
Closely correlated
-6.27%
FIX - MTZ
76%
Closely correlated
-7.45%
MYRG - MTZ
75%
Closely correlated
-5.77%
More