AC
Price
$35.02
Change
-$0.50 (-1.41%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
703.04M
QUILF
Price
$1.82
Change
-$0.03 (-1.62%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.41B
Ad is loading...

AC vs QUILF

Header iconAC vs QUILF Comparison
Open Charts AC vs QUILFBanner chart's image
Associated Capital Group
Price$35.02
Change-$0.50 (-1.41%)
Volume$100
Capitalization703.04M
Quilter
Price$1.82
Change-$0.03 (-1.62%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.41B
AC vs QUILF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AC vs. QUILF commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AC is a StrongBuy and QUILF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (AC: $35.53 vs. QUILF: $1.82)
Brand notoriety: AC and QUILF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AC: 88% vs. QUILF: 41%
Market capitalization -- AC: $703.04M vs. QUILF: $1.41B
AC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $703.04M. QUILF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQUILF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QUILF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QUILF is a better buy in the long-term than AC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

AC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.99% price change this week, while QUILF (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

AC is expected to report earnings on May 10, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.03% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QUILF($1.41B) has a higher market cap than AC($703M). AC has higher P/E ratio than QUILF: AC (18.85) vs QUILF (6.09). AC YTD gains are higher at: 3.708 vs. QUILF (-0.165). QUILF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 108M vs. AC (47.7M). QUILF has more cash in the bank: 1.51B vs. AC (407M). AC has higher revenues than QUILF: AC (12.7M) vs QUILF (-3.19B).
ACQUILFAC / QUILF
Capitalization703M1.41B50%
EBITDA47.7M108M44%
Gain YTD3.708-0.165-2,250%
P/E Ratio18.856.09310%
Revenue12.7M-3.19B-0%
Total Cash407M1.51B27%
Total DebtN/A293M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AC vs QUILF: Fundamental Ratings
AC
QUILF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1598
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
99100
SMR RATING
1..100
8157
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5239
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8935
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AC's Valuation (33) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QUILF (89) in the null industry. This means that AC’s stock grew somewhat faster than QUILF’s over the last 12 months.

AC's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as QUILF (100) in the null industry. This means that AC’s stock grew similarly to QUILF’s over the last 12 months.

QUILF's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as AC (81) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that QUILF’s stock grew similarly to AC’s over the last 12 months.

QUILF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as AC (52) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that QUILF’s stock grew similarly to AC’s over the last 12 months.

QUILF's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AC (89) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that QUILF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

AC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AC has been loosely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AC jumps, then BX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AC
1D Price
Change %
AC100%
-1.80%
BX - AC
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
VRTS - AC
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
APAM - AC
33%
Loosely correlated
+2.40%
JHG - AC
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
TROW - AC
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
More

QUILF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUILF has been loosely correlated with KRMCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QUILF jumps, then KRMCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QUILF
1D Price
Change %
QUILF100%
-1.76%
KRMCF - QUILF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AC - QUILF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
STCGF - QUILF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGGNY - QUILF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
SOLCF - QUILF
8%
Poorly correlated
+13.38%
More