AC
Price
$36.66
Change
-$0.14 (-0.38%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
773.29M
BN
Price
$65.45
Change
-$0.15 (-0.23%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
98.41B
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AC vs BN

Header iconAC vs BN Comparison
Open Charts AC vs BNBanner chart's image
Associated Capital Group
Price$36.66
Change-$0.14 (-0.38%)
Volume$1.75K
Capitalization773.29M
Brookfield
Price$65.45
Change-$0.15 (-0.23%)
Volume$1.74M
Capitalization98.41B
AC vs BN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AC vs. BN commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AC is a Hold and BN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (AC: $36.66 vs. BN: $65.45)
Brand notoriety: AC and BN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AC: 49% vs. BN: 74%
Market capitalization -- AC: $773.29M vs. BN: $98.41B
AC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $773.29M. BN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $98.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the long-term than AC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • BN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the short-term than AC.

Price Growth

AC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.80% price change this week, while BN (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.77% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($98.4B) has a higher market cap than AC($773M). BN has higher P/E ratio than AC: BN (148.75) vs AC (14.43). BN YTD gains are higher at: 14.310 vs. AC (7.291).
ACBNAC / BN
Capitalization773M98.4B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.29114.31051%
P/E Ratio14.43148.7510%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A246B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AC vs BN: Fundamental Ratings
AC
BN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7267
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9623
SMR RATING
1..100
8590
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8711
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AC's Valuation (31) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (33). This means that AC’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for AC (96). This means that BN’s stock grew significantly faster than AC’s over the last 12 months.

AC's SMR Rating (85) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (90). This means that AC’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as AC (56). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to AC’s over the last 12 months.

BN's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for AC (87). This means that BN’s stock grew significantly faster than AC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACBN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MANA.X0.2967720.008118
+2.81%
Decentraland cryptocurrency
REQ.X0.1521070.000612
+0.40%
Request cryptocurrency
FIGB43.030.01
+0.02%
Fidelity Investment Grade Bd ETF
FDFF37.55-0.23
-0.62%
Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF
MAKX50.81-0.69
-1.34%
ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF

AC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AC has been loosely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AC jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AC
1D Price
Change %
AC100%
-0.38%
SEIC - AC
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
BN - AC
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
PFG - AC
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
MFIC - AC
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
OWL - AC
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.15%
More

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
-0.23%
BAM - BN
84%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
KKR - BN
82%
Closely correlated
-2.59%
BX - BN
81%
Closely correlated
-1.75%
JHG - BN
81%
Closely correlated
-1.97%
APO - BN
80%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
More