Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABWAX vs RLBFX
ABWAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ABWAX vs RLBFX
AB All Market Total Return A
Price$16.12
Change+$0.05 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets426.89M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$36.94
Change+$0.18 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
ABWAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABWAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABWAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. ABWAX (427M). ABWAX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: ABWAX (2.93) vs RLBFX (2.10). ABWAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ABWAX (22 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). ABWAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). ABWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 182.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABWAX: RLBFX (250) vs ABWAX (2500). ABWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.86 vs. RLBFX (8.18). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.24 vs. ABWAX (22.49).
| ABWAX | RLBFX | ABWAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.29 | 376% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.29 | 379% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.971 | 8.222 | 97% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 427M | 252B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 2.10 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.86 | 8.18 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.19 | 36.13 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.49 | 43.24 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.41 | 68.15 | 52% |