Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABWAX vs RLBFX
ABWAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ABWAX vs RLBFX
AB All Market Total Return A
Price$16.53
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets426.78M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.08
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
ABWAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABWAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABWAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. ABWAX (427M). ABWAX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: ABWAX (2.86) vs RLBFX (2.05). ABWAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ABWAX (22 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). ABWAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). ABWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 182.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABWAX: RLBFX (250) vs ABWAX (2500). ABWAX (10.80) and RLBFX (10.28) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.46 vs. ABWAX (19.44).
| ABWAX | RLBFX | ABWAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.29 | 376% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.29 | 379% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.717 | 11.562 | 93% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 427M | 259B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.86 | 2.05 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.80 | 10.28 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.40 | 40.92 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.44 | 41.46 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.05 | 78.40 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement