ABVN
Price
$1.20
Change
+$0.99 (+471.43%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.92M
MSSUF
Price
$10.05
Change
-$1.84 (-15.48%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABVN vs MSSUF

Header iconABVN vs MSSUF Comparison
Open Charts ABVN vs MSSUFBanner chart's image
ABV Consulting
Price$1.20
Change+$0.99 (+471.43%)
Volume$395
Capitalization2.92M
Metal Sky Star Acquisition
Price$10.05
Change-$1.84 (-15.48%)
Volume$198
CapitalizationN/A
ABVN vs MSSUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABVN vs. MSSUF commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABVN is a Hold and MSSUF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (ABVN: $1.20 vs. MSSUF: $10.05)
Brand notoriety: ABVN and MSSUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABVN: 14% vs. MSSUF: 112%
Market capitalization -- ABVN: $2.92M vs. MSSUF: $0
ABVN [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $2.92M. MSSUF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABVN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMSSUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ABVN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MSSUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABVN is a better buy in the long-term than MSSUF.

Price Growth

ABVN (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MSSUF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.17% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABVN YTD gains are higher at: 100.000 vs. MSSUF (-14.758). ABVN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -35.39K vs. MSSUF (-598.33K). ABVN has less debt than MSSUF: ABVN (47.5K) vs MSSUF (2.13M). ABVN (0) and MSSUF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ABVNMSSUFABVN / MSSUF
Capitalization2.92MN/A-
EBITDA-35.39K-598.33K6%
Gain YTD100.000-14.758-678%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash4.14KN/A-
Total Debt47.5K2.13M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABVN: Fundamental Ratings
ABVN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LCII88.04-2.42
-2.68%
LCI Industries
IOVA2.24-0.07
-3.03%
Iovance Biotherapeutics
EXPE165.63-6.07
-3.54%
Expedia Group
PSQH2.12-0.13
-5.78%
PSQ Holdings
BRTX1.68-0.32
-16.00%
BioRestorative Therapies

ABVN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ABVN and MSSUF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABVN and MSSUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABVN
1D Price
Change %
ABVN100%
N/A
MSSUF - ABVN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACBD - ABVN
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AASP - ABVN
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMLTF - ABVN
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRAF - ABVN
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More

MSSUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSSUF has been loosely correlated with DIST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSSUF jumps, then DIST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSSUF
1D Price
Change %
MSSUF100%
N/A
DIST - MSSUF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KVACU - MSSUF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMCG - MSSUF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISRL - MSSUF
26%
Poorly correlated
+7.28%
MSSAF - MSSUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More